Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snowrip
No, look at Kelo. Should Connecticut have been required by the federal government to adhere to a rigorous definition of Fifth Amendment rights as set by the federal government in some manner?

We have Conservatives who think Kelo should have been settled by requiring Connecticut to use eminent domain ONLY for public purposes, to wit,roads, schools, sewers, water, and sport stadiums.

146 posted on 04/25/2011 5:28:44 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: snowrip; rintense
Fes up, you like those condemnations to assemble private properties so sports stadiums can be built.

I could not help but notice that you and your little friend ritense avoided that one.

So, they condemn old houses rented out by private parties as homes for poor people, and then they build a publicly financed stadium that SELLS skyboxes to the rich.

155 posted on 04/25/2011 10:19:35 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson