[Hot Tabasco]

This was nothing more than a kangaroo court.........so much for his (our) 1st amendment rights.

As a side note, since when does a seated judge have the right to call a trial for any individual wishing to hold a public rally?

[OldDeckHand]

"As a side note, since when does a seated judge have the right to call a trial for any individual wishing to hold a public rally? "

I don't know. It's baffling. I can't imagine what the matters of fact are for the jury to decide. How can a jury decide facts that haven't happened yet?

This never should have survived a motion to dismiss, which I'm assuming was filed.

[k5kor]

unconstitutional prior restraint and actionable violation of civil rights under 18 USC 1983. This man is a hero. He is emerging as a leader for the Christian crusade.