Replies

Right, you have a police record (which you wont source) with someone’s name that you cant connect to the victim (no aliases on your report). You use that to say that it is a definite connection between the two. When asked to backup any facts you have, you fall back into “not revealing sources” and “I have other tools on my computer” as if you fear your journalistic integrity will be harmed (we dont know who you are).

Then there is the part where you claim sources gave you the info, and later you said you found it all on your computer. So which is it, did someone tell you or did you look it up?

Then you claim that the victim didnt have her ID (do you have any proof of that) because you think she is a tranny prostitute, but she did have it when charged by the police, who got the correct name. For that to be true, she would have had her real ID while she was prostituting herself, but didnt take it to McDonalds. That would seem to be the opposite of what logic would dictate (why would you have your real ID when prostituting.

Then, after all that, you have the gall to use personal insults as an argument tactic and question the intelligence of someone else.