April 7 -- 6:40 p.m.b>
Shawn Tyson, police say, shoots at an occupied vehicle, then beats up the driver.
April 7 -- 10 p.m
Tyson, 16, is arrested on a charge of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon after admitting he fired the gun. He is taken to juvenile jail.
April 8
Tyson appears in court, where a first-appearance judge agrees with prosecutors that Tyson should remain in custody. Saying Tyson has shown a pattern of escalating violence that threatens the community, the judge tells prosecutors to bring a detective to court to illustrate that point when Tyson appears before his trial judge the next week.
April 15
Tyson appears before a second judge, who is urged by a different prosecutor and a probation officer to release Tyson to the custody of his mother, who promised to keep him in her home and under control.
_____________________
Kudos to you for filing a complaint. If 'sheer ignorance' were a crime; more than a few here, guilty and they should pay the consequences.
As well, given his record, this 'youth' should not have even been in 'Juvenile' Court. (Again; stupid Liberals, guaranteed.) Am wondering too; if recommendations are not written onto 'case info' so that Juvenile Judge would know case assessment and 'full recommendations' per first Judge. Why the reliance on Prosecutor? Much less, his memory; or intentions; or someone else entirely showing up on Prosecutor's behalf. . .
Not just ignorance in evidence here; but as well, an insanity (oh, that Liberal thing again, so I repeat myself). . .on behalf of those who should know better and who unfortunately and pathetically, are entrusted by the Public, for their 'own good'.
This is where the lies began. The Probation Officer's statements are in direct opposition to the mother's testimony.
Ignorance is no excuse as all of this info was a keystroke away on the county site.