Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Explorer89

Oh come on, you wouldn’t get zotted for such a thing.

At times, Michelle looks okay. All of us, fat to thin to very fat to very thin, look better if attired properly.

It’s the media and their adoration of this so-called fashion icon, a very unworthy fashion icon, that causes so many of us to go to extremes on the other side. If the lies and silliness about Michelle’s fashion would stop maybe more of us would give her a nod or two should it be warranted. As it stands now, why bother? The media sucks up to her enough for all of us.

First, Michelle is not a little woman. She’s tall, a bit awkward of step, has the behind of an African-American woman, which is not necessarily a bad thing in that’s what she is. But let’s not pretend she’s Twiggy or anything.

People of all types can be dressed properly and on occasion, I’ve seen Michelle look very nice.

She really ought to lose the boob belt thing she’s so obsessed with. Yeah, sure, fashionistas recommend moving the waist line up to a smaller part of the body, which is in most cases below the boob. If the waist line is moved iin such a manner, say like in a dress specifically designed with a high waist, it can look good. There is also required a jacket of some sort to kind of disguise the high waist belt.

Michelle’s habit of just slapping on a belt, buckling it below the boob line, often looks just plain silly, like a bigger woman trying to convince us her waist line is this little and teeny-tiny. That picture of her with that geometric designed sweater that someone said looked like right out of the Salvation Army....goodness, she should have just left the belt off for God’s sake. Instead she’s got this big macho looking belt thing all obvious below her boobs...if nothing else, a smaller, less inyourface belt maybe.

Also, her hair. I’ve seen Michelle with hair that looked very nice. It’s when she does that thing pulling it back so severely that she looks like an escapee from the ghetto. I know it’s easier to do it this way at times but go with me here, she’s the First Lady. Even that nutjob from Texas always wears a headpiece of some kind. It might be extra work to be fixing her hair all the time but that pull back just looks bad, nowhere near elegant or sophisticated.

She’s no fashion icon, however, she does not have good taste, she’s not sophisticated...us boobs can see right through this media hype and the more they say it, the more we mock.

We are all most ordinary females like Michelle but the NY Times is not showing pics of our uglier outfits while calling us splendid fashionistas.

Heh.


84 posted on 04/22/2011 10:05:00 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/2011/02/freerepublic-ping-list-compilation.html-Freep Ping Blog post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Fishtalk

“First, Michelle is not a little woman.”

The jury’s still out as to whether she even IS a woman — little or otherwise.


116 posted on 04/23/2011 1:00:53 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson