I’m confused, how does the fact that Obama’s entire history is full of holes ‘affirm’ that people shouldn’t be delving deeper into finding the truth?
What is that? The lay down and die strategy for someone that claims to be journalist?
Journalists only investigate Conservatives. With a fine tooth comp and a microscope. Liberals are off limits. Especially Black Liberals.
What people are missing is that the place of birth isn’t as much of a question as the nationality of his father. No one seems to want to go there. In this age of the anchor baby, it benefits zerO politically to be seen as one who was born here with one American parent. It gives him solidarity with a large demographic.
The holes that really matter, IMO, are the passports, the SSNs, the lack of work history, the academic records, the reason for cancellation of his and Michelle’s law licenses, and the classification as *Muslim* while in school in Indonesia.
Add to that, the trust that owns the Chicago home, which is made up of people with questionable backgrounds, the actual transaction of buying that home and the side yard, and the Saudi scholarship and subsequent donation to the university.
Ayers has already been arrogant enough to claim authorship of one or both of his campaign books and no one cares.
I have no doubt that all the information could be obtained, if enough people were confident they could divulge it without repercussions. Most of the records exist in Dem-dominated states, so it will be protected until it can be erased, if it isn’t already erased. The question then is “Why was it erased?”.
The place of birth can be worked around and that is likely why the zerO crew wants us to concentrate on it. It is the totality of questionable documentation and lack of essential documentation that might change perceptions. As for invoking a Constitutional clause that has never been tested and for which there is little case law, it is a losing proposition, politically. All it does is underscore his *diversity* credentials.
Personally, it is better for our side to concentrate on his absolute incompetence and to highlight his miserable personality and thuggish demeanor and that of his unionista supporters.
Tactics and strategy are what I believe Breitbart and others are emphasizing. zerO needs to be seen as a total incompetent fraud and that takes more than a birth certificate. After all, today’s societal consensus believes that he isn’t responsible for his birth circumstances and that same consensus does not care about the Constitution. Like it or not, it is a losing battle and likely one that actually benefits zerO by painting the birthers as out-of-step, old, irrelevant white folk obsessed with racist and nativist hatred.
What is that? The lay down and die strategy for someone that claims to be journalist?
A most excellent point/question.
"Breitbart responds, "I have not looked at the facts because I've said even it were true, it would be a losing battle. It would split the country. When we for the first time ever – as fiscal conservatives and constitutional-minded citizens – have a winning argument for what we stand for. And I do not want to divide the country. So I honestly haven't read the information."
I'm all for party (conservative) politics...but to me, the Constitution and the country comes first. Without the Constitution intact, there isn't much of a country left as we knew it.
Breitbart is saying, to him, the Constitution is a secondary issue...if at all.
I noticed that sentence too-
The libtard media is having to do an awful lot of ‘1+1 not equal 2’ stories for Obammy, and you would think they would be getting tired of it