Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reformedliberal
" They had majorities for 2 years and could have passed any statute that would have allowed zerO’s circumstances to be *deemed* NBC. They haven’t."

A statute to change Article II, Section I? You're a real Constitutional scholar, just like little Barry. Who declared you were "reformed" anyway?

35 posted on 04/22/2011 8:30:32 PM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Godebert

I did not say it was Constitutional. I said that a Democrat majority in both Houses could have done such a thing, just as they deemed bills passed and all the other unconstitutional actions they have taken.

It is interesting that you have some need to sneer, link me to zerO and then make snide comments about my ideology. What sort of persona do you think you are projecting? Most conservatives debate ideas, rather than resort to snarky ad hominems.

Control of both Houses of Congress, plus the Presidency, in the hands of progressives who denigrate the very idea of the Constitution, has already resulted in so many violations, it is tedious to even list. We would do well to never expect them to behave in a manner consistent with the Constitution as we have known it.

I chose my handle here with forethought. I understand the left and hopefully, that will be helpful in fighting them. Certainly, it is unhelpful to fight among ourselves.


38 posted on 04/22/2011 8:48:26 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson