To: Winged Hussar
How often is >100, 300, 500, or 1000 yards even an option?
2 posted on
04/21/2011 10:47:51 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
(Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
To: ctdonath2
In afghanistan the distances are easily in those ranges on a regular basis
7 posted on
04/21/2011 10:57:12 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: ctdonath2
When I went through Basic in the summer of 1965, the Army had transitioned to "Trainfire". My Guard Unit in Wisconsin was still using the old ranges with their pits and hoist targets.
At least we were issued M-14s. Of course, the kids from the Big Apple and such still boloed alot because of the "kick", but it was a rifle I had confidence in.
We need to transition back to the 7.62 Nato and give our men and women a real weapon.
8 posted on
04/21/2011 10:57:29 AM PDT by
Redleg Duke
("Madison, Wisconsin is 30 square miles surrounded by reality.", L. S. Dryfus)
To: ctdonath2
The taliban regularly engage at 500 yards and our soldiers are at a disadvantage at that range.
We need .308s and Grendels
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson