for those who don’t feel like clicking the link, the jist of the arcticle is that the House should investigate ... excerpt below.
“An investigation into Obama’s eligibility by a committee or subcommittee of the House could have several legitimate objectives, including among others:
1. To ascertain the facts, compelling by subpoena the production of all the available records relevant to Obama’s eligibility, including the complete Hawaiian records of his birth; his passport records to ascertain whether he traveled to Pakistan in 1981 on an American or other passport; the records from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School to determine whether Obama described himself as a foreign student; and such other records as may be relevant. The disclosure of such information to the public would be an appropriate exercise of Congress’ “informing function.”
2. The consideration of legislation to require candidates for a federal elective office to produce, at an appropriate time, evidence of their eligibility for that office. There is now no federal law or regulation that requires such disclosure.”
3. The consideration of legislation to define the constitutional term, “a natural born Citizen.”
It should also have item 4: Consider the consequences and action to be taken to NULLIFY orders and laws signed by an unconstitutional office-holer- including mandatory hard-labor jail sentence for all involved in the coverup. [Hi Nancy~!]
I might add a 4th to that list:
The right of an elector of the Electoral College ( of either party ) to challenge the eligibility of a candidate before casting his electoral vote. An elector of one party can challenge the candidate of the other party or even his own party.
As you may recall, an elector is not bound to vote in the manner of the vote result of his state. Every elector is a lone wolf.
The Electoral College has no business casting their electoral votes without conclusively determining Constitutional eligibility of the winning candidate.