Skip to comments.
Gay Marriage Opponents Now in ZOT
FiveThirtyEight ^
| 4-20-11
| Nate Silver
Posted on 04/21/2011 4:42:01 AM PDT by technonerd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: manc
Exactly. If the rest of us hadn’t been spineless coward neutered bunny rabbits, the homo-agenda would be in the closet where it belongs.
41
posted on
04/21/2011 7:21:55 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: technonerd
This is a rather ominious analysis from the social-conservative viewpoint. Propaganda is a much simpler word troll.
Take a look at the Proposition 8 analysis -that is reality.
42
posted on
04/21/2011 7:34:18 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: Ronin
43
posted on
04/21/2011 9:13:24 PM PDT
by
liberalism is suicide
(Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
To: technonerd; xzins; P-Marlowe; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW; scripter; trisham; metmom; central_va; ...
This is a rather ominious analysis from the social-conservative viewpoint. So, you joined FR last week to try to get us to drop social conservatism? Or is technonerd not your first FR name?
The question is: where to go from here?
For actual conservatives, the answer to that will ALWAYS be to continue to advance conservatism.
The best obtainable solution is probably to sidestep the problem by separating marriage and state.
Are you a retread, or did you simply join to promote sodomy? Marriage is a solemn union between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, anything else is a satanic abomination.
Perhaps you should read this:
44
posted on
04/22/2011 5:30:52 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: technonerd
Possible “Non-Sequitur”.......
45
posted on
04/22/2011 5:36:06 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: technonerd
Just shows why it’s important, as was said upthread, to keep winning elections.
It also shows what I feel is a basic disconnect, where the majority of the population seems willing to grant special rights to two percent of the population.
46
posted on
04/22/2011 5:38:55 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
To: technonerd
We don’t need your advice.
47
posted on
04/22/2011 6:37:53 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
the answer to that will ALWAYS be to continue to advance conservatism That's what I said -- advance conservatism; get the government out of its entanglements with everything under the sun.
To: technonerd
This is just your agenda driven propaganda...
Nate Silver must be a little light in the loafers...
49
posted on
04/22/2011 6:49:50 AM PDT
by
Sir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
To: little jeremiah
technonerd
Since Apr 14, 2011
Hmmm...
50
posted on
04/22/2011 6:51:15 AM PDT
by
Sir Francis Dashwood
(Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
To: technonerd; xzins; P-Marlowe; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW; scripter; trisham; metmom; central_va; ...
That's what I said -- advance conservatism; get the government out of its entanglements with everything under the sun. I realize that you and your libertarian ilk are prey to some sort of alternate history, but the FACT remains that governments have been involved in licensing marriages since medieval times. It is a historical and traditional function of government, especially those governments that have their roots in English Common Law.
Now, libertarians love to say that we should just get the government out of marriages, but this is often because they don't want to admit that they favor homosexual marriage.
In no way does your proposal "advance conservatism," all it does is further the destruction of America.
51
posted on
04/22/2011 6:54:12 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
52
posted on
04/22/2011 6:57:53 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
Amen to that.
I’ve seen some of Ron Paul’s acolytes advance the idea that we should get government out of marriage in public forums that had a cross section of participants. The radical gay activists stood to their feet and cheered when these ideas were voiced. This is no coincidence. They know damned well that if marriage is not protected on every single front they will divide and conquer us all. Just like they are doing now because the Republicans are almost all a bunch of judicial supremacists.
53
posted on
04/22/2011 6:58:46 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(What part of NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE do you fail to understand?)
To: trisham
It's just another way to advance the left's agenda.
54
posted on
04/22/2011 6:58:54 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: technonerd
People come, and people go, but stupid goes on forever. Stupid is laboring under the impression that marriage can be separated from the state. Who judges when it comes time to dissolve a marriage. You?
55
posted on
04/22/2011 6:59:03 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: technonerd
56
posted on
04/22/2011 6:59:50 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(What part of NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE do you fail to understand?)
To: wagglebee
the FACT remains that governments have been involved in licensing marriages since medieval times Governments have set wages and prices by edict since at least the time of the Roman Emperor Diocletian. That's a bad idea, too.
To: EternalVigilance
Ive seen some of Ron Pauls acolytes advance the idea that we should get government out of marriage in public forums that had a cross section of participants. They want to get the government out of everything, that's how they advance their immoral agenda.
Sometimes I honestly wonder where the libertarians get their history, because what the Founding Fathers believed and did is VERY DIFFERENT from what the libertarians portray.
58
posted on
04/22/2011 7:04:24 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
It's just another way to advance the left's agenda.*********************************
Yes. This "poll" is pure propaganda.
59
posted on
04/22/2011 7:06:45 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: technonerd
Nonsense. We gain nothing by ignoring the truth--that homosexual fake marriage is harmful to society, and that homosexual behavior is disordered and gross.
Our side needs to put up or shut up. If you can't be bothered to defend traditional marriage, don't complain when the homosexuals come after YOUR children.
Want to do something? Get involved.
National Organization for Marriage
Our side has just begun to fight. Get on board or get out of the way.
60
posted on
04/22/2011 7:07:55 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Fight the homosexual agenda. Support marriage -- www.nationformarriage.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson