“I had him once as my #1 pick for the Supreme Court. Six yrs ago I would not thought Trump but today he has so far my vote. When we have such a weak bunch running for prez “The Donald” is by far the best.”
I had never heard of Mark Levin before coming on here, and I still haven’t ever heard his show, so I’m just going on what the transcripts posted are, and the kind of people supporting or against him. I was keeping it light for that reason, but by the sound of things he’s as much a loose cannon (as much damage to our own as to the enemy), Levin is, as anyone that could be named who’s claiming to be conservative.
The criticisms of Trump are valid - I mean the ones that are actually factually aimed at him and not claiming some extrasensory perception of what his ‘true’ motivations are. And they are concerns of mine too, but that’s all they have to be now - concerns. Let him address our concerns, not name-calling when he’s not there to respond, allegations that can’t really be disproven or proven, like why he does this or that, what he really thinks, etc.
He should be getting full support from any real conservative, anyone who really cares about the Constitution, for everything he’s aimed at the current administration. Criticize him for the things he’s saying now that are debatable or objectionable - tariffs, keeping Libyan oil, Iraqi oil, etc. But do it in context; do it in constructive criticism, not in the way some are here, including apparently Mark Levin. And you all know who this is addressed to (not you, Digger) without my naming names.
“I have never heard of Mark Levin before coming on here”
But you do know who the “Donald” is.
That’s a problem