“As I said, if you haven’t been getting your misleading information from those guys, you are working way too hard.”
Guess I’ve been getting it from the US Supreme Court. Which is the lead every court in the US will follow...
“If there is any kernel of pertinent fact in that response you need to condense it. I’m not going to wade through that long parade of fallacy of authority examples.”
Brilliant! Tell the US Supreme Court to go to hell, that you don’t care WHAT they write about the subject! Of course, if you had read it, you would see that they gave an opinion on the subject in the late 1800s. And no, they are not going to overturn that argument to throw out a sitting President.
For over 100 years, it has been settled law that a man with a foreign born parent can run for President. You may not like it, and I don’t agree with their decision, but it sure is stupid for folks to pretend it doesn’t exist.
I'm not arguing with the Supreme Court, i'm arguing with you. If you don't comprehend the difference between an argument based on "first principles" and the "Fallacy of Authority" then I'm not EVEN going to argue with you.
I don't CARE what courts have decided. I care what the FOUNDERS have decided.
Unless you've got a Supreme Court case specifically dealing with Article II compliance, I don't want to hear your court cases.
I know One Supreme Court Decision (Wong Kim Ark I think) specifically said they WERE NOT dealing with "Natural Born Citizen" issues. Find one that does and you've got my attention.