Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notary Sojac

Any literature, photos, live action, artwork or any other media which uses children - real or fictitious - in a sexual manner, is disgusting and until the Supreme Court (leftist at the time), porn producers and the ACLU decided that “free speech” mean pornography and obscenity were protected, none of the above would see the light of day.

Anyone who thinks that literature or any media that uses real or fictitious children in a sexual manner is fine is sick in the head and morally blind.


55 posted on 04/20/2011 3:31:06 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
One of the important elements of conservatism is that there is a large number of things which are not "fine" and yet not appropriate for legal sanction.

As I said up thread, "verbal" kiddie porn is extremely distasteful to me. It's not "fine" at all.

65 posted on 04/21/2011 4:50:37 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Birth Certificate Derangement Syndrome - have you been tested??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson