To: allmendream; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW; trisham; metmom; TheOldLady; BykrBayb
Which of the limited and enumerated powers of Congress covers having an “anti-porn task force”. I understand how much libertarians despise the commerce clause, but it's still there.
If done at the State level this wouldn't be a problem - but not everything worth doing is worth having a Federal “task force” assigned to it.
Now if the libertarians were to confine their beloved pornography to within the individual states this would probably work, but they don't do that now do they.
33 posted on
04/20/2011 12:57:19 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
It is not just those much reviled “libertarians” that despise an overly expansive reading of the commerce clause - but also anyone who is a Constitutionalist or a Conservative.
35 posted on
04/20/2011 1:04:11 PM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: wagglebee
Thanks for posting this article.
40 posted on
04/20/2011 1:41:45 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
I understand how much libertarians despise the commerce clause, but it's still there.You must be a big fan of Franklin Roosevelt.
66 posted on
04/21/2011 6:16:47 AM PDT by
jmc813
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson