Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NATO war in Libya violates U.N. mandate, Russia says
reuters.com ^ | April 19, 2011

Posted on 04/19/2011 6:55:08 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Russia said on Tuesday Western attempts to topple Muammar Gaddafi were a violation of a U.N. resolution on Libya, which only authorized the use of force to protect civilians.

"The U.N. Security Council never aimed to topple the Libyan regime," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said. "All those who are currently using the U.N. resolution for that aim are violating the U.N. mandate."

Given such a Western position, the Libyan opposition was refusing to negotiate a ceasefire with the regime in Tripoli, Lavrov said. "It is crucial to establish a ceasefire," he said on a visit to Belgrade.

Britain and France have urged other NATO allies to provide more attack aircraft capable of hitting Gaddafi's ground forces after Washington reduced its role in the operation and passed command to NATO on March 31.

Lavrov said that the opposition in Yemen was apparently also hoping for Western help, similar to the NATO operation in Libya, to topple President Ali Abdullah Saleh.

"Probably using the same logic, the opposition in Yemen is refusing the possibility to sit at the negotiating table, hoping for that kind of help from abroad," Lavrov said.

The United Nations Security Council was due to meet later on Tuesday to discuss Yemen, where Western and Gulf Arab allies fear a prolonged standoff could spark clashes between rival military units in the capital Sanaa and elsewhere.

Lavrov said the opposition's hope that it will receive Western aid was "a very dangerous logic which can cause a chain reaction."

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: obvious

1 posted on 04/19/2011 6:55:12 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Sad thing is, they are right...


2 posted on 04/19/2011 6:56:00 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Russia and China abstained, because they knew that the Libyan war would weaken the U.S. and Europe.

So they pretend to disapprove. But they didn’t veto it.


3 posted on 04/19/2011 6:57:53 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

I would like to see them prosecute the British and French for war crimes, like they did the Croatians.


4 posted on 04/19/2011 7:01:27 PM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
No i think they both bought Hillary's lies about it. There is a clear violation of the UN deal, but do you expect the people at the UN and britain and france causing this crap to be held accountable. Hell no.
5 posted on 04/19/2011 7:04:56 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Yeh, it makes me feel bad that I'm cheering the Russians criticizing my own country (basically).
6 posted on 04/19/2011 7:05:15 PM PDT by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Cicero
Russia and China abstained because the UN resolution did not call for the removal of their terrorist ally Kadhafi and they agree with Imam Obama that regime change is not an option since the UN only gave Imam Obama permission to start a war, not actually to WIN one.

Russia and China want us to go to war only if we are not allowed to WIN. That is why Kadhafi must now be overthrown. Whomever replaces the incompetent ignoramus Obama will have to finish the job he is incapable of.

8 posted on 04/19/2011 7:10:41 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kevslisababy

I do not consider the Obama Administration...American.


9 posted on 04/19/2011 7:13:38 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (Shut up and eat your Beans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

you got me there!


10 posted on 04/19/2011 7:14:42 PM PDT by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

What is scary, is I am agreeing with the Russians more than my own government (terrorists, pirates, Libya etc)


11 posted on 04/19/2011 8:08:22 PM PDT by When do we get liberated? (A socialist is a communist who realizes he must suck at the tit of Capitalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

Yup, kinda spookie


12 posted on 04/19/2011 9:26:37 PM PDT by Dawggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
We should listen to Russia because they know about playing by the rules. /s

FUVP and your mini-me.

13 posted on 04/19/2011 10:38:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson