I am apparently unusual in finding such convictions disturbing. No actual 15 year old minors were contacted, but he's in jail anyway.
I agree he's a scumbag and thoroughly deserves a flogging, but he has apparently been convicted of a crime that didn't actually occur.
Would you be happier if a 15 year old was involved?
‘Indecent exposure’ and apparently .. to a minor!
Scumbag .. Piece of Crap .. should be shot!
Of course this is JMHO!
“...but he has apparently been convicted of a crime that didn’t actually occur.”
The crime is TRYING to have unlawful contact with a minor, I guess. In any case, the witnesses presented the evidence, the lawyers made arguments, and the judge instructed the jury in the law, whereupon the jury rendered a verdict. So he’s GUILTY.
the guy has a history of this sherm...stop sticking up for traitors
You mean like ATTEMPTED bank robbery? Or ATTEMPTED murder? Or ATTEMPTED rape? Or ATTEMPTED acts of terrorism?
Crimes like these don’t occur either but the would-be perps are still prosecuted.
Masturbating in front of a minor. How classy :-|
Intent can be a crime
Are you kidding?
BTW, (old saying) if you're a sweaty, balding, obese 50 y.o with erectile dysfunction,living in mommy's basement communicating with a "luscious" 15 y.o who just can't wait to have sex with you, you're talking to a COP.