Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why a Palin Run is Imminent or at Least Ineluctable
Tweets and Retweets from RAMansour/SarahPAC | Vanity

Posted on 04/18/2011 10:45:15 AM PDT by Anamnesis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Rational Thought

If that is the case, I will be sitting out the first presidential election since I have had the privilege of voting.

Wrongney is Obama Lite. Under either candidate, the country is headed for collapse.


21 posted on 04/18/2011 11:32:39 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis
Sarah Louise Palin

Born February 11, 1964 in Sandpoint, ID (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)

Parents were
Charles R Heath, born in ID
Sarah Sheeran, born in WI

Both parents were US Citizens at the time of her birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

Sarah Palin is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN unlike Comrade Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.

22 posted on 04/18/2011 11:33:01 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

The interview with Couric was edited more than Obama’s life story.


23 posted on 04/18/2011 11:38:06 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Trump challenging anyone from the right is an outright fraud.


24 posted on 04/18/2011 11:41:11 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
Any chance she runs as a Third Party candidate representing the Tea Party?

I don't think so. We are in the process of taking over the Republican Party. This next election is crucial in our fight to take back and restore our constitutional government. Palin for president as a Republican is a must in our endeavor to reach that goal, along with a host of new tea party minded congressmen and senators getting elected.

Some may ask why Palin? Because I believe she is the only one who understands the problem and has the desire and ability to take on an entire ingrained Washington DC establishment. This will truly be a reform movement by, for and of The People.

25 posted on 04/18/2011 11:41:43 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
I sure hope you are wrong. If she isn't electable then it doesn't matter who the Republican candidate is. Our national nightmare will continue...

By the way, that Couric interview is no longer an issue. Palin has grown up and become more media savvy since that interview. I don't believe you will ever see her mess up like that again.

26 posted on 04/18/2011 11:42:44 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

I’m guessing she announces at least to the exploratory committee level sometime next week—just in time for the first debate.


27 posted on 04/18/2011 11:42:52 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Forget Romney... Obama care is modeled after Romney Care in Massachusetts. That alone will torpedo Mitt’s chance of winning. Furthermore, Romney will be attacked again for being a Mormon and called a radical Fundamentalist (just like last time). Finally, Romney is a moderate at best and not a conservative. It would be just be more of the same $hit from Washington a different day. In other words George Bush III. As most of us already know we cannot continue to go this route if our Nation wants to remain a Super Power.


28 posted on 04/18/2011 11:43:58 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

Comments like yours ultimately say that she shouldn’t be allowed to throw her hat in the ring and prove herself. They tell her to sit-down, shut-up, unless she just sits on the sidelines and cheerleads.

I believe Palin has earned the right to make her case before the nation. Her speech in Madison facing the union thugs, showcases her potential power as a candidate.

If she’s such a flawed canidate, like you make out, will not the primary season eliminate her?

I’m just asking, folks, and I am deadly serious.

If she can make the case for her vision of America, and she can rack up the victories early on, what does that say about her would be voters? Are they just Palinistas who are idol-struck and non-thinking?

Everyone seems to forget that the primary process isn’t just a couple of weeks of intense ad campaigns and then ZAP, off to the voting booth. There are going to be debates, dozens of them. Interviews with the various local medias will be held by all contenders. There will be local campaign headquarters and precincts all over the fruited plains filled with loyal volunteers doing all that they can to see that their candidate comes out on top in their respective states.

Palin will not be able to win by hiding out on Facebook, Twitter, Fox News, or any of the friendlier talk shows. She is going to have to move beyond her base and tackle those souls who don’t pay attention to politics to the same degree as those of us on Free Republic, Hot Air, Ace of Spades, Red State, and all the rest of the blogs. And if she were to WIN those voters, what speaks louder, the fact that she can capture such votes or that the rest of the GOP voters in that state were not sufficiently motivated enough to vote for anyone else?

The candidate Palin becomes after emerging from the primary process (assuming she enters and wins) won’t be the same Palin that everyone is talking about in this thread. She will be a battle hardened, well versed, b@lls-to-the-wall competitor who won’t be a wallflower in the fall campaign season.

Lest we all forget, it was about this time in 2006 when we all thought that the 2008 Presidential run was going to be a New York affair between Rudy and Hillary. My, that seemed like an ice age ago.

Clinton was tough, but she never got the anal exam that Palin got.

So before we all start dismissing that “Caribou Barbie” as being a) unintelligent, b) unqualified, and c) unelectable, remind yourselves as to what they were saying about Reagan back in 1978. They were far worse on him than even on Bush-43.

For my money, I will entertain no such talk about how Palin can’t win, so she must be stopped before she even decides to run. That kind of thinking is for half-hearted Conservatives who don’t dare recall the stakes involved, and how this country can’t handle another four years of Obama or even another RINO. If we are going to correct the mistakes of the current administration, we don’t need a wimp, but a warrior who has already been baptized by the fire of unrelenting assault by just about everything in the universe.

If she throws her hat in the ring and wins it all during the primary season, it will be through the sweat of her efforts, and the hard work of the people who will walk through fire on her behalf.

Palin is no goddess, nor perfect. But she is a patriot, deserving of the same chance to run for the highest office in the land if that is what she chooses. Let’s see what happens, and let history attend to itself.


29 posted on 04/18/2011 11:46:43 AM PDT by Anamnesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Russ

I think the ONLY Republican candidate that can get elected (if he runs) is Trump. A lot of people already know him. Moreover, with the current state of our economy who do you think the voters would trust more to run the U.S. like a Business? I know Trump is not the “ideal” candidate for conservatives or even Republicans, but is very electable (meaning Independents/Sing Voters coming over). We have to get Obama out of office or he will destroy our Republic. Look what Obama has done in his brief time. We have to do this even if this means electing not the ideal candidate.

Trump can handle the media and press too. He has been doing it all his life. Trump is not afraid to say anything. He has NOTHING TO LOSE (unlike other Politicians) since he is already a Billionaire. I believe Trump can point us in the right direction. I certainly would trust Trump more than Obama on the economy. You can counter balance Trump and bring over Tea party voters by putting Bachmann on that ticket. Trump/Bachmann in 2012 I believe would easily roll over Obama/Biden.

Again just my opinion.


30 posted on 04/18/2011 11:55:59 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

Who is this RA mansour person? Reason I ask is that name rings a bell as the person who helped get uhbama into harvard. Just curious. If so-this makes no sense.


31 posted on 04/18/2011 11:58:56 AM PDT by Republic (The entire White House presidential team needs to grow up and face facts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis

This post is 2 cool!!! :D


32 posted on 04/18/2011 11:59:00 AM PDT by erod (Unlike the President I am a true Chicagoan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis



33 posted on 04/18/2011 12:00:04 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
Well, you seem to be lobbying for a third party on this thread, question or not.

Palin has always taken on the GOP. Famaliarize yourself with her actions in Alaska, where she was involved in politics.

That doesn't make her a candidate for running third party, but staying in the Republican party and working to bring it back to what it used to be (and should still be.)

And fighting the corruption in the party as she did in Alaska.

I think that Trump will be the candidate with Romney as his VP, and Palin will win with write in votes.

34 posted on 04/18/2011 12:01:42 PM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
I agree with everything you said.

I'm making a point of this as a significant component of taking the Republican Party back.

As an analogy, look at the budget battle. Republican Party leadership began with a cutback number of $100 Billion. But, during negotiations, the leadership took their main bargaining chip off the table, the shutting down of the Government. As a result, the final compromise number was $352 million.

The budget battle not only reflects how weak Republican Party leadership is, it also indicates they don't truly take the Tea Party seriously.

Like the budget battle, if we want to take back the Republican Party, I believe our strongest bargaining chip is the possibility splitting off as a major Third Party.

I know the conventional wisdom says, a Third Party will likely give Obama another term. I also know that another “Moderate” Republican nominee, whom the Party Leadership seems destined to support, will definitely us the same.

35 posted on 04/18/2011 12:02:26 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Anamnesis
That's nice but I've always know she's going to run;0)

"Laura Chase, the campaign manager during Ms. Palin’s first
run for mayor in 1996, recalled the night the two women
chatted about her ambitions..... “I said, ‘You know, Sarah,
within 10 years you could be governor,’ ” Ms. Chase recalled.
“She replied, ‘I want to be president.’ ”

GO SARAH!!

36 posted on 04/18/2011 12:03:01 PM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

If gasoline prices are still in the $5 range, and the economy is having a Carter malaise deja-vu, you could be elected president.

Anybody could be elected president. Even Alvin Greene!

It’s the economy stupid, and no magic halo this time.

It has never been easier for a candidate to run against this socialist usurper of our freedoms. If Palin wants to be president, this is her time to run.


37 posted on 04/18/2011 12:04:49 PM PDT by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Republic

Uh I think you’ve got a mix-up going on.

She’s a Palin aide that has been described by the NYT as her “cyber messenger”. She founded and wrote for Conservatives4Palin before she was hired to work for SarahPAC.

Rebecca Mansour was initially an Obama supporter, but quickly quickly converted once his record was known and she saw the savagery of the left against Palin.


38 posted on 04/18/2011 12:08:21 PM PDT by Anamnesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Republic
She's the the very sharp tip of Sarah's online spear...

Behind Sarah Palin, a low-profile but high-impact aide

Sarah Palin's Secret Asset: Cyber-Messenger Rebecca Mansour

Top Sarah Palin Aide Unmasked: Rebecca Mansour Comes Out Of The Shadows

On Twitter

39 posted on 04/18/2011 12:08:57 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

All you got to say is,

“Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?’

Worked like a charm for some guy that trounced Carter.


40 posted on 04/18/2011 12:09:39 PM PDT by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson