The social cons who continue to favor the nanny state and the spending on entitlement don’t belong in anything attached to the Tea Party which was formed in response to government bailouts and fiscal irresponsibility.
Not killing babies doesn’t mean nanny state. Why do you piggyback entitlements with not killing babies?
Are you stupid or just lying?
I resent your insinuation that I support a nanny state. Could you clarify exactly what you’re trying to accuse me of? Plase, I’d like specifics.
That makes no sense whatsoever. If you aren’t a social conservative, that means you support enormous spending on social programs. Social liberals and social moderates have made it clear you cannot get out of spending one dime to these programs and still consider yourself social liberal/moderate. Look at Scott Brown. He had to fund every cent of Planned parenthood.