[misterrob]

Social cons may be against abortion but many favor the nanny state and entitlements. Explain how I am lying.

Furthermore, they are attempting to but in an another movement’s agenda. How’s about limited tax people showing up at a pro-life rally and passing out their stuff only to be told to stop. Would that be kosher with you?

[circlecity]

"Social cons may be against abortion but many favor the nanny state and entitlements."

please provide some evidence to back up that statement. (And no I would have no problem with low tax people handing out leaflets at a pro-life rally - I welcome all conservatives to the table)

[little jeremiah]

The Tea Party is not anti-life. It’s not “another” agenda. The TP is not limited to anti-tax stuff.

And you know darn well that social conservatives are not the same as people who want huge government and entitlements galore. The huge government and entitlements galore folks are the Leftists.

Why don’t you vent your (considerable) spleen on the Lefists? Hmm?

[little jeremiah]

I notice your nasty comment to wagglebee was pulled. You cannot argue fairly because (a) you lie and (b) you use dirty personal attacks.

[Jim Robinson]

FR is a pro-God, pro-life, pro-family site. If you have a problem with our pro-life positions, you might want to try a site that is more to your liking. Meanwhile, I’ll thank you not to trash our deeply held beliefs here.

[EternalVigilance]

Furthermore, they are attempting to but in an another movement’s agenda. How’s about limited tax people showing up at a pro-life rally and passing out their stuff only to be told to stop. Would that be kosher with you?

The original Tea Party was not about taxes. It was about the natural rights of the people.

From the original Tea Party organizer himself:

"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature."

"'Just and true liberty, equal and impartial liberty,' in matters spiritual and temporal, is a thing that all men are clearly entitled to by the eternal and immutable laws of God and nature, as well as by the law of nations and all well-grounded municipal laws, which must have their foundation in the former."

-- Samuel Adams, The Rights of the Colonists - The Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting, Nov. 20, 1772

So, exactly who is "butting in" on whose "movement"?