Replies

Well what I am saying is that Mark Levin is a fool for attacking Trump. Trump is the one guy who is raising the BC issue which is an issue others have tried to raise and been silenced by the media.

So Trump may not be the best guy to do it, in that he has baggage. But you couldn’t find anyone better to do it who the media will listen to. In so much as they gave him a platform to talk.

I think anyone trying to attack the messenger is attacking the message. Levin is definitely not into the BC issue. I myself haven’t been a hardcore conspiracy kook saying that Obama was creating a scheme in Kenya to run in the US or whatever. But to question Obama’s qualifications is the right thing to do.

As for Levin, he has been attacking fellow conservatives for years. Glenn Beck, Michael Savage and Alan Keys. For some reason he found them to be a threat and not pals to respect and support. So he lost my interest. To each his own.

For whatever good Levin tried to do, he has burned so many bridges with fellow conservative radio hosts that it is sad. Then he pimps his rino pal Sean Hannity. Least Hannity was researching Obama’s connections in 07-08 and reporting on it.

And yes, I don’t agree with Beck on the BC issue either. I myself have been lukewarm on the issue. If people make wild claims about Obama’s past then their is no way to prove it. But to ask for documentation and to seek his qualifications for being president of the United States is not wrong.

I fear the GOP is attacking Trump not because of his past. But because of his claims. So now, the same people who gave Trump an chance to speak are trying to silence him when they don’t like what he has to say.

The fact is that we probably disagree. Fine, but I;m sick of the people trying to attack others who are on the same side like Levin.

This Levin guy went after my own conservative Senator last year, when he ran for election. Yet, my guy Jerry Moran of Kansas is one of the few good guys out there in the dumb senate. Moran joined the senate tea party caucus. Yet, Levin felt it was his job to attack a guy who has a 92% lifetime rating from the ACU because the other guy who lost has a 95% rating. 3% more. 3%. Which I have no idea how one gets a 3% more or a 3% less. But that other guy Todd Tiahrt wasn’t much better, if not worse. Tiahrt supported Bush’s Amnesty. And when that came out he lost the election.

So Levin might be all that, but he sure has a way of attacking the very people opposing Obama.

And now his buddy Rush Limbaugh is liking Trumps message. So what does that say? Guess Levin just doesn’t agree with Limbaugh then.