Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mitch77
“Because he does not have to prove he was...no no no,the accusers have to prove he was not. “

So my 29 year old child doesn't have to prove he's qualified to be president? Someone has to prove he isn't?

So if I want to obtain a license to practice medicine or law or some such, I don't have to prove I'm qualified, someone has to prove I am not?

Does it work that way with everything?

4 posted on 04/17/2011 5:56:10 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KrisKrinkle
So my 29 year old child doesn't have to prove he's qualified to be president? Someone has to prove he isn't?

Proof of eligibility FROM Obama was due in 2008. It was waived. So now proof is demanded from those who maintain he isn't.

E.G. Obama had to present proof of eligibility before he was admitted to the Bar of the State of Illinois. Once admitted, the Bar later had to present proof that he had lied in that presentation. The State Bar has a process for handling those who are wrongly admitted, and an entire of range of disciplinary measures and sanctions. The Federal Government apparently does not.

41 posted on 04/17/2011 11:21:20 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Qadafi and Obama share a common advantage. No organized opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson