Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb

I don’t know if anyone really thinks that is a realistic time frame...so this will more than likely be a first iteration.


41 posted on 04/18/2011 3:32:43 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (I LOVE the harrassment of Obama and his White House by pitbull Donald Trump. Get out the popcorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanInTokyo
Seems pessimistic to me. This is a common way of bounding the worst-case of an unknown situation. Remember we heard things like the Deepwater Horizon spill was going to be an "Extinction-Level Event". The Gulf was still there, last I heard. When Saddam blew up Kuwait's oil fields when we kicked him out after the first Gulf War, those fires were going to burn for "decades". They were all out within a year and the fields were back in production.

The major problem right now is to establish some kind of closed-loop cooling on the three reactors and one SFP. That will get away from this once-through cooling they are doing now that keeps flushing effluents out and causing the problems with handling and disposal. But its a conundrum because to get loop cooling you need to get in there and do some plumbing to connect the lines, which is difficult when you have high dose rate effluents being pumped out.

42 posted on 04/18/2011 4:45:37 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Controlled cold shutdowns usually take 2 years. My guess they’ll be close to that or more.


43 posted on 04/18/2011 8:21:34 AM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson