Vitrification
Long-term storage of radioactive waste requires the stabilization of the waste into a form which will neither react nor degrade for extended periods of time. One way to do this is through vitrification.[23] Currently at Sellafield the high-level waste (PUREX first cycle raffinate) is mixed with sugar and then calcined. Calcination involves passing the waste through a heated, rotating tube. The purposes of calcination are to evaporate the water from the waste, and de-nitrate the fission products to assist the stability of the glass produced.[24]
The 'calcine' generated is fed continuously into an induction heated furnace with fragmented glass.[25] The resulting glass is a new substance in which the waste products are bonded into the glass matrix when it solidifies. This product, as a melt, is poured into stainless steel cylindrical containers ("cylinders") in a batch process. When cooled, the fluid solidifies ("vitrifies") into the glass. Such glass, after being formed, is highly resistant to water.[26]
After filling a cylinder, a seal is welded onto the cylinder. The cylinder is then washed. After being inspected for external contamination, the steel cylinder is stored, usually in an underground repository. In this form, the waste products are expected to be immobilized for a long period of time (many thousands of years).[27]
The glass inside a cylinder is usually a black glossy substance. All this work (in the United Kingdom) is done using hot cell systems. The sugar is added to control the ruthenium chemistry and to stop the formation of the volatile RuO4 containing radioactive ruthenium isotopes. In the west, the glass is normally a borosilicate glass (similar to Pyrex), while in the former Soviet bloc it is normal to use a phosphate glass. The amount of fission products in the glass must be limited because some (palladium, the other Pt group metals, and tellurium) tend to form metallic phases which separate from the glass. Bulk vitrification uses electrodes to melt soil and wastes, which are then buried underground.[28] In Germany a vitrification plant is in use; this is treating the waste from a small demonstration reprocessing plant which has since been closed down.[24][29]
We’ve been using dry cask storage in the US for years.
How many US nuclear reactors are located in areas suseptible to tsumanis? Thought I’d ask before the panic sets in... oh wait...
Isn’t Yucca Mountain dry storage?
Didn’t the weenie in the WH recently cave into pressure from Harry Reid (or pay him back for 2008 election help: take your pick) by ruling out a Yucca Mountain nuclear repository?
http://www.lvrj.com/news/nuclear-waste-blue-ribbon-panel-to-start-work-86253967.html
In short, by unilaterally taking off the table the safest location for spent nuclear fuel, didn’t POTUS jeopardize the health and safety of all Americans for short-term political gain?
We ought to take all the spent fuel, and make it into a fence along our borders, especially in high crime areas. That, along with land mines, would go a long way to protect the U.S. from the illegals and invaders, once we quit feeding them.
http://www.business-mongolia.com/mongolia/2011/04/01/mongolia-might-store-foreign-spent-nuclear-fuel-senior-u-s-official-says/