Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

It’s not as if they’ve never had actual female figureheads, as well as actual leaders, before.


5 posted on 04/16/2011 9:02:00 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: skr

“It’s not as if they’ve never had actual female figureheads, as well as actual leaders, before.”

Elizabethian era, Victorian era...


6 posted on 04/16/2011 9:15:35 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: skr

Yes but the feminists will bitch that it was because there were no male heirs before them, and that’s not the right way to become the leader.

One would question why an offspring automatically is the right choice to be a ruler just because dad and mom were, that’s no guarantee their child is the best person to take over when they’re gone. Male or female.


12 posted on 04/16/2011 9:30:59 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson