Replies

To all
The way GOP’ers should answer criticism from the MSM & Rats
is the following:

Rat(or MSM): Bring up Zero and claim GOP’er is aiming this at Zero

GOP’er: Know it is not, some states have required it in the past (Cite Eisenhower) I think its a good idea (Cite the Central American Socialist candidate) why do you keep bringing up Zero, do you think he has a problem?

Rat: Continues to claim its aimed at Zero

GOP’er: You must really be worried about Zero, I am sure he will be fine.

Rat: Sputters more about Zero, claims racism.

GOP’er: Do you really think Zero has a problem in making this requirement?

The GOP’er must stay on that message and NOT be lured off it.
He must throw it right back at those who object and ask why the objections if Zero is eligible.

This really isn't hard to figure out or do, but apparently beyond the intellectual capacity and self discipline of the average GOP state legislator. Why do we elect such fools at the city, county, state & federal level?

Roger Calero <- That's the Central American guy who got on the ballot. Five state whose SOS’s couldn't be bothered with actually doing the constitutionally required part of their job! (I think he was from Costa Rica or maybe Nicaragua.)

This bill has some teeth, but so did the Arizona bill in its original form.

http://legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=742268