Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/12/2011 8:06:08 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Taiwan makes cruise missles and torpedos, don’t they?


2 posted on 04/12/2011 8:10:43 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well when you consider the US has had aircraft carriers since the 20’s and there is no country on the planet more adept and experienced at carrier ops than we are and we STILL have aviation mishaps at sea, I can hardly wait to see the Chicom’s learning curve on their first cruise. Bet they lose at least 1/3 of their airwing.


4 posted on 04/12/2011 8:19:19 PM PDT by NWFLConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

5 posted on 04/12/2011 8:23:51 PM PDT by magslinger (What Would Stephen Decatur Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Taiwanese need to develop some classes of weapon named, say, Temujin, Mongke, Qublai...


6 posted on 04/12/2011 8:34:45 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki; NWFLConservative

Quite a saga so far. Twenty-five years old and it has yet to put to sea as an operational vessel.

What aircraft are they going to use on this thing anyway?


8 posted on 04/12/2011 8:41:20 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

*


11 posted on 04/12/2011 9:01:45 PM PDT by Beaten Valve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Red Dragon ping


14 posted on 04/12/2011 9:40:30 PM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The first PLA carrier is going to be used for training more carrier staff and pilots and develop their own carrier operations experience. That will take time, but as the staff and pilot pool increases and experience is accumulated, China will build a US style carrier because it represents the state of art. If China wants to symbolically emulate power why imitate secondary powers like France and Britain who have medium size carriers that are insufficient to maintain a no fly zone over Libya when a US style carrier can? If the PLA has ambition to build a stealth fighter it is ambitious enough to build a US type carrier. The Russian carrier Varyag is only the first stepping stone to something much larger and complicated.
In the past, I would consider Chinese not a major threat unless it builds US style aircraft carrier navy. The last carrier navy we ignored was Imperial Japan, and we know how that story ended.


16 posted on 04/12/2011 10:41:51 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki; lentulusgracchus; sergeantdave; PzLdr

Okay, Looking up Varyag/Shi Lang, I find the sister ship—the Admiral Kuznetsov—currently serving, has a complement of 12 Su-33 (carrier version of Su-27) and 5 Su-25UTG/UBP (carrier version of Su-25 Frogfoot) and a clutch of Kamov Ka-27 variant helos.

So I can only assume that the Chinese version will carry something similar. You can’t just take any old fighter aircraft and stick a tailhook on it. Carrier aircraft have to be designed for the job from the wheels up, although the Varyag ski jump design exists to spare the planes the stresses of catapult launches.


25 posted on 04/13/2011 11:53:44 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson