Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/12/2011 5:44:30 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Anyone who still does not have everything they think they will need in the future is really nuts.


2 posted on 04/12/2011 5:45:52 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (GO TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Holy shit! Say goodbye to any new Saiga shotguns!!!!!

Might have to get another one, if the prices haven’t yet gone to the Moon.....


3 posted on 04/12/2011 5:47:15 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Since New York State already bans centerfire rifles for hunting except in the extreme northern part of the state, all they will allow for deer and bear are shotguns.
The BATFE needs to be disbanded. It serves no useful purpose other than to enforce liberal agenda.


4 posted on 04/12/2011 5:50:34 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Obama did not learn incompetence; he was born to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Did someone in the obumbum administration miss the latest gun case out of the US Supreme Court:

McDonald v. Chicago involved a 2nd Amendment challenge to a Chicago ordinance that essentially banned private handgun ownership in the city.

In 2008, a divided Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. Heller , struck down similar District of Columbia legislation on the grounds that it violated an individuals 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear firearms for lawful uses such as self-defense in one’s home. But the Court declined to say whether this 2nd Amendment right applies to the states and local governments and not just the District of Columbia, which is under federal jurisdiction. The Court answered this question in McDonald.

In a five-four split decision, the McDonald Court held that an individual’s right to keep and bear arms is incorporated and applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause. Writing for the majority, Justice Alito observed: “It is clear that the Framers and ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty” (p. 31). “The Fourteenth Amendment makes the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms fully applicable to the States. ” In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Thomas wrote that the 2nd Amendment is fully applicable to states because the right to keep and bear arms is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment as a privilege of American citizenship.

The Court did not rule on the constitutionality of the gun ban, deciding instead to reverse and remand the case for additional proceedings. However, the courts decision on the 2nd Amendment makes it clear that such bans are unconstitutional. But, as it held in Heller, the Court reiterated in McDonald that the 2nd Amendment only protects a right to possess a firearm in the home for lawful uses such as self-defense. It stressed that some firearm regulation is constitutionally permissible and the 2nd Amendment right to possess firearms is not unlimited. It does not guarantee a right to possess any firearm, anywhere, and for any purpose.

The dissenting judges argued that the right to own guns was not “fundamental” and therefore states and localities should be free to regulate or even ban them. They said the Heller decision on which the Court relied heavily was incorrect and even if correct, they would not have extended its applicability to states.

So the BATFE argument that a shotgun not suitable for "sports" is a red herring and has no standing in law> I won't get into the HELLER case:

7 posted on 04/12/2011 5:54:11 PM PDT by paratrooper82 (We are kicking Ass in Afghanistan, soon we will be home to kick some more Asses in Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I wonder if “sport” can be extended to hunting liberals?


8 posted on 04/12/2011 5:55:19 PM PDT by rockrr ("Remember PATCO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

10 posted on 04/12/2011 5:59:07 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy." -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“generally recognized as particularly suitable for a readily adaptable to sporting purposes.”

For the record...I just re-read the Second Amendment. I don’t find that exception in there...ANYWHERE.

BATFE needs to be eliminated. Defund them.


15 posted on 04/12/2011 6:02:08 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Insane. How many millions of importable shotguns have 7 round tube mags?

And the sporting test: Practical shooting is not a sport now?

Motherhuggers, all.

18 posted on 04/12/2011 6:03:45 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The Democrat Party is Communist. The Republican Party is Socialist. The Tea Party is Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Many great evils arrive with many small steps.


24 posted on 04/12/2011 6:15:49 PM PDT by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Molon labe baby!
26 posted on 04/12/2011 6:17:35 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

of course those things are needed for sporting purposes, for shooting cans....etc..


28 posted on 04/12/2011 6:19:51 PM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

sfl


30 posted on 04/12/2011 6:27:18 PM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Any American made versions of these, or are they banned under different regs? Not saying I like these unconstitutional regs, but exploring work-arounds...


32 posted on 04/12/2011 6:34:23 PM PDT by piytar (Godwin's rule is null and void. If you don't know what I mean, you aren't paying attention...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The 2nd Amendment is about the violent overthrow of the government. It is not about hunting or thieves( common, not political ).


34 posted on 04/12/2011 6:43:42 PM PDT by Leisler (Our debts are someone's profit. Follow the money, the vig.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Some more BS from the feds. My Moss 500 Rolling Thunder falls against the rules in the proposed ban and is designed for home defense. Like the other "assault weapon" bans they don't like it because it looks scary.


38 posted on 04/12/2011 7:18:17 PM PDT by digital-olive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Remember the "Assault Rife" Ban?

It listed items on a rife that would cause it to be designated an "Assault Rifle".

This is nothing more than the beginning of the ban on shotguns.

It lists items any one ( 1 ) of which would deny importation.

An example: a flash suppressor or a muzzle brake that also suppresses flash;

Most shotguns made today use screw in choke tubes.

Any screw in choke tube that has ports or is ventilated could easy be designated to be a flash hider.

a light enhancing device;

A Leupold Scope or an Aim Point?

an integrated rail system other than on top of the receiver or barrel;

A Cantilever barrel for your deer hunting slug gun?

an “excessive” weight of over 10 pounds;

Most 10 ga Side by Side double barrel shotguns weigh between 10 and 12 lbs. BTW many of them are made in Spain.

Death by a thousand paper cuts.

Ban importation, then ban domestic production, then ban possession.

Worry about your Saiga if you like.

BATF wants all your Mossbergs, Remingtons and Winchesters.

41 posted on 04/12/2011 8:42:06 PM PDT by TYVets (Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Second Amendment Special!

Urge Your Representative To Cosponsor H.R. 822, The National Right to Carry Reciprocity Act Of 2011

Grassley Questions Whether ATF Tried to Thwart Gunrunning Probe

Obama's Gun Guru: A Profile of An Uncooperative, Ineffectual Policy Non-Entity

Constitutional Refuseniks(Oathkeepers) Very interesting read & thread

45 posted on 04/12/2011 10:23:37 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I suppose an e-mail to the effect that “You BATFE thugs are domestic enemies of the Constitution” would win a person an all-expense-paid cruise to Lisbon aboard a Portugese Man o’ War.


46 posted on 04/13/2011 12:15:28 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson