Skip to comments.
FLASHBACK: Obama Wins First State Senate Election Because of Legally Ineligible Opponents
Chicago Tribune
Posted on 04/11/2011 3:37:54 PM PDT by TigerClaws
The Chicago Board of Election Commissioners had previously sustained an objection to the nominating petitions of Lynch because of insufficient valid signatures, and subsequently sustained objections to the nominating petitions of Askiawho was left with only 688 valid signatures on his nominating petitions, 69 short of the required 757 valid signatures after almost two-thirds of the 1,899 signatures on his nominating petitions were found to be invalid, and Ewellwho was left with only 671 valid signatures on his nominating petitions, 86 short of the required 757 valid signatures after almost half of the 1,286 signatures on his nominating petitions were found to be invalid.[28][32] Lynch and Ewell, in separate federal lawsuits, unsuccessfully sued the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners seeking to reverse its decision to remove their names from the ballot.[28][33]
Primary and general elections In the March 19, 1996 primary election, Obama, running unopposed on the ballot, received 16,279 votes in winning the Democratic nomination for state Senator for the 13th District.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Senate_elections_of_Barack_Obama
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: certifigate; chicago; elections; ineligible; obama; senatorobama
The election was over once Obama received the Dem nomination (a racial set aside district).
To: TigerClaws
IneligibleThat word now has a pleasant ring to it. Would it be ironic if the first thing that brought Obozo to public office was the very thing that took him out?
2
posted on
04/11/2011 3:42:08 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: TigerClaws
What goes around comes around.
3
posted on
04/11/2011 3:43:59 PM PDT
by
Sprite518
To: Texas Fossil
Perfect. And it would destroy the Rats with him.
4
posted on
04/11/2011 3:44:11 PM PDT
by
screaminsunshine
(Obama Sucks and so do the RINOS.)
To: Texas Fossil
Barry may yet truly understand the meaning of the word KARMA.
5
posted on
04/11/2011 3:46:08 PM PDT
by
JPG
("2012 Can't Come Soon Enough" - Sarah Palin)
To: screaminsunshine
Yep, uncover this steaming pile of crap and it would destroy the Dems with him.
6
posted on
04/11/2011 3:46:23 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: TigerClaws
In 08 socialist presidential candidate Roger Calero sued over the fact that he was disqualified in some states but not others.
The fact is Calero shouldn’t have been allowed on any ballot because he isn’t even a citizen. He’s previously deported resident alien.
7
posted on
04/11/2011 3:46:50 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: JPG
Barry must eventually understand the meaning of “the United States of America” and “We the People”.
Those are foreign to his makeup.
8
posted on
04/11/2011 3:48:11 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: TigerClaws
Obama, Inc is not the friend of other Democrats. The Dems should have figured that out a very, very long time ago and stopped the cartel when they had the chance. The Dems either have to go with the Obama plan or get out of the way. There is no middle ground. There are a lot of former Congressmen who might still be in office if they had understood and acted. Obama, Inc owns the Dems now and the old network will be replaced completely and thoroughly by whomever Obama,Inc feels is more in line...and there will be no place for the old guard. It's not just the GOP that Obama Inc wants to destroy.
9
posted on
04/11/2011 3:48:11 PM PDT
by
madinmadtown
(Marx, the patron saint of blame, envy and destruction.)
Sounds to me like, if someone was able to infiltrate the ballot petition organizations of their opponents, they could wipe them off the ballot just before the election.
10
posted on
04/11/2011 4:06:47 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: madinmadtown
>>Obama, Inc is not the friend of other Democrats.
Very true. The Democrat primary was chosen by the DEMOCRAT RULES AND BYLAWS committee, not the people.
11
posted on
04/11/2011 4:27:00 PM PDT
by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: TigerClaws
That's interesting. I wasn't aware of him in 1996, but I was amazed that when he ran for U.S. Senate in 2004, his opponents in both the Primary and General Elections self-destructed, allowing him to win without the scrutiny a candidate normally receives.
So, it appears that he has never actually had to run a real campaign before running for the Presidency in 2008.
To: TigerClaws
Primary and general elections In the March 19, 1996 primary election, Obama, running unopposed on the ballot, received 16,279 votes in winning the Democratic nomination for state Senator for the 13th District. So he happened to run unopposed for State Senate and happen to see his Republican opponent shamed out of the U.S. Senate race. This guy has fantastic "luck" doesn't he?
13
posted on
04/11/2011 5:32:09 PM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Obama & Reid: for the debt ceiling before they were against it.)
To: TigerClaws
All of the "signatures" on Øbozo's petitions were stamps like this:
14
posted on
04/11/2011 5:38:27 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: TigerClaws
BO had Ryan’s divorce made public but he can’t show any of his bona fides???? The irony is just too much! But then again it is the Shitcago way!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson