[decimon]

But the victim may not be related to the other New York murders as a young person’s body ‘would not fit a serial killer’s pattern’, according to law enforcement sources.

What if some particular serial killer didn't care about their patterns?

[rebapiper]

What about the low life New York governor Elliot Sfittzer
I know I spelled his name wrong.
It use to be Clinton and the New York prostitutes,
They all covered for him, Where is Danny boy today still in hiding?
Elliot was very much a part of the prostitution ring and so
was Governor Patterson. Elliot walks without Prison time and he is able to appoint Patterson just in case. Patterson had to keep Elliot from jail time and keep the prostitutes safe and keep their MOUTHS SHUT. Elliot of course gets a TV spot, but the threat of Elliot and Patterson being exposed is still there, SO OF COURSE THESE PROSTITUTES HAVE TO DIE.
They need to stop playing games and go right to the source of the problem. Elliot and Patterson, who is protecting them and who has been hire to kill those girls????

[Boogieman]

“What if some particular serial killer didn’t care about their patterns?”

More importantly, why are they talking about “a serial killer’s pattern”, as if there is only one? Every serial killer is an individual, and the pattern that each one follows can change frequently. What doesn’t change is the “signature” of a serial killer, but their “pattern” or M.O. can be highly flexible.

Ted Bundy preferred young women, but not pre-pubescent, but at the end of his ‘career’, he took a pre-pubescent victim, perhaps out of desperation. Zodiac changed his M.O. twice at the end of his (confirmed) ‘career’. I wonder if the press came up with this on their own, or if there really is someone this clueless in charge of the investigation.