wow..you have a real problem..lots of anger all over the place..and not much ability to respond to some key points that you just don’t get, or ignore.
First,re dogs..I never “raised them to the level of humans...”
But I guess you don’t have much of an appreciation of what
“an amazing creation a human is...” ...that it is no big deal that humans ( uh, that “amazing creature” ) would engage in such animal cruelty for sport.
You equate a nanny state with ignoring the realities of WHO these dog fighters really are...the “realities” of dog fighting connections to a) people abuse, child abuse,b) drugs selling c) gangs ( but then, that doesn’t matter, cause the people that do that should be allowed to do that too...because dogs are “property”..and to these sick, sadistic people think some people are their ‘property”.
So let me just get this right...if I am against animal cruelty and do NOT want these people legally sanctioned ( for a variety of reasons that would protect society) then I am advocating a nanny state?
To use your phrase, “Don’t go crying when “ one of these sick sadistic violent people move from dogs to people...
Of course, you will be very very quiet on recognizing that connection then...No one will hear your outrage then!
Why again should you tell someone how to treat what is theirs?