Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago school bans some lunches brought from home
Chicago Tribune ^ | April 11, 2011 | Monica Eng and Joel Hood

Posted on 04/11/2011 7:31:09 AM PDT by yoe

To encourage healthful eating, Chicago school doesn't allow kids to bring lunches or certain snacks from home — and some parents, and many students, aren't fans of the policy

A Little Village Academy student cringes at an enchilada dish served at his school. Many students throw away their entrees uneaten and say they would rather bring food from home. The school, though, does not allow students to bring in their own lunches, unless they have a medical condition or a food allergy.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: arth; chartwellsthompson; chicago; fernandodominguez; foodnazis; foodpolice; illinois; publicschools
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Hoodat
'Control' is the key word here.

Well, this issue is about much more than the food that kids eat. I raised two children, quite successfully. I learned early on that the more you try to control what a child does, the more they sneak around to do things that they themselves control - and that leads to very negative results. All that too much control does is breed anarchy - their is a delicate balance that is often violated one way or the other.

One has to loosen the strings of control on small items early on, and on large items later in life so that the child becomes confident in making his/her own decisions - and making the correct ones. Removing the child from the decision-making process steals from them the ability to make good decisions later in life. In that situation, they never mature unless and until they completely rebel and go out on their own.

There was a bloody revloution in the late 1700s that illustrated quite clearly the results of too much control imposed on the populace. There was another bloody encounter in the 1860s, less than 100 years later. It's been longer than that since such as that occurred, but it's looking like the time for another may be nearing.

41 posted on 04/11/2011 8:12:17 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More (The mighty zero, obama,does not warrant the respect necessary for his name to be capitalized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Here's what I found so far:

According to Bob Bloomer, regional vice president of Herndon, Va.-based Thompson Hospitality, the largest minority-owned foodservice company in the United States . . .

Chartwells-Thompson wins Chicago Public Schools account

42 posted on 04/11/2011 8:14:14 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: yoe; All
D.C. school lunch firm (Chartwells-Thompson) questioned on nutrition

A company that serves meals to 2½ million schoolchildren daily in more than 500 districts nationwide, with multimillion-dollar contracts in both Washington and Chicago, has a history of marginal quality and food-safety scares amid concerns over the nutritional content of its school menus, according to school and company records.

Chartwells-Thompson School Dining Services, a subsidiary of the Charlotte, N.C.-based Compass Group, owner of Burger King, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut, is one of North America's largest school cafeteria operators — its contracts with the Chicago Public Schools from 2001 to 2009 totaling more than $289 million and a D.C. operation that could net the firm as much as $140 million from 2008 to 2013.

Besides sharing the same food service provider, the D.C. and Chicago districts both suffer from high rates of poverty and child obesity in what are known as "food deserts," areas with poor access to healthy, affordable food. The District has the highest rate of adolescent obesity in the country, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Chicago ranks fourth-highest.

Even as Congress weighs recommendations from the not-for-profit, nongovernmental Institute of Medicine (IOM) for improving national school lunch standards, the D.C. school district does not list the nutritional content of school meals on its Web site — contrary to the more transparent policies in New York, Atlanta, Los Angeles and Seattle.

Just last year, in the face of Chicago's child-obesity problem, Chartwells defended serving desserts to schoolchildren even as other districts abandoned the practice. Likewise, the company served cheese nachos on a daily basis as a means of getting children to partake in school lunch options.

In 2007, Chicago school officials similarly defended Chartwells' cereal-for-lunch offering, which included sugary brands such as Trix and Cocoa Puffs. Two years later, cereal maker General Mills announced it was reducing the sugar content in its products, including Trix and Cocoa Puffs, in the face of growing scrutiny from consumers, regulators and health groups over the nutritional value of their foods.

A Chicago schools spokesman said the city's school meals "meet or exceed" federal standards.

43 posted on 04/11/2011 8:19:25 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
But parent Miguel Medina said he thinks the "no home lunch policy" is a good one. "The school food is very healthy," he said, "and when they bring the food from home, there is no control over the food."

At Claremont Academy Elementary School on the South Side, officials allow packed lunches but confiscate any snacks loaded with sugar or salt. (They often are returned after school.) Principal Rebecca Stinson said that though students may not like it, she has yet to hear a parent complain.

This whole community reeks of authoritarianism. It's clearly predominately Hispanic; does "culture" have something to do with it?

44 posted on 04/11/2011 8:20:27 AM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

45 posted on 04/11/2011 8:25:09 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

The grade of the food used in school lunches isn’t that great.

For example diseased chickens with open puss filled sores are allowed to be used for chicken nuggets used in schools. The cooking process kills the bacteria so its safe.


46 posted on 04/11/2011 8:26:57 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Chicago vomited out the Obamanation. They are complicit. Let the Marxists rot in the putrid bed they have made.


47 posted on 04/11/2011 8:27:47 AM PDT by fwdude (The world is sleeping in the dark that the Church just can't fight, 'cause it's asleep in the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yoe; bamahead; 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; Aggie Mama; agrace; AliVeritas; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)

The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.

48 posted on 04/11/2011 8:29:07 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

‘Public education is WELFARE’

Public schools are not welfare, we pay for them whether our children use them or not.


49 posted on 04/11/2011 8:29:35 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Cafeteria workers in Chicago government schools are ‘represented’ by either SEIU or a ‘public service employees’ union of some ilk, right?


50 posted on 04/11/2011 8:31:08 AM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend

“... depend on the federal school lunch cash...”

You are absolutely correct... follow the money. Whether the kids eat free, reduced fee or bring their own, the cafeteria is losing money. I would get a medical note in a hurry rather than have my kids eat that slop. IMHO


51 posted on 04/11/2011 8:32:22 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
Correct. Because failing to study for a test is an 'unhealthful academic choice'; and it is the schools' job to protect children from ALL of their own unhealthful choices.

[Sigh]...

52 posted on 04/11/2011 8:36:18 AM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: yoe
But parent Miguel Medina said he thinks the "no home lunch policy" is a good one. "The school food is very healthy," he said, "and when they bring the food from home, there is no control over the food."

Baaaaaaaa. Baaaaaaaaa. Baaaaaaaa.

Come on, little programmed sheep -- bleat for us some more.

53 posted on 04/11/2011 8:39:42 AM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

The quality of school lunches is barely above animal feed. They use the cheapest, most disgusting ingredients possible. I would not allow my kids to eat that crap, my kids bring thier lunch, if such a policy comes here, we move, period.


54 posted on 04/11/2011 8:43:17 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justice14

They’d probably be shocked you wanted to pay for it and weren’t demanding the school provide it for free.


55 posted on 04/11/2011 8:43:44 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

But they ARE required to use the pus to make sweat and sour dipping sauce, so at least there is no waste...

;-)


56 posted on 04/11/2011 8:44:17 AM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I’d take my child out of that school!


57 posted on 04/11/2011 8:49:21 AM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Did you read the Principal’s Page? It’s barely coherent.


58 posted on 04/11/2011 8:49:27 AM PDT by keepitreal ( Good manners never go out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Many students throw away their entrees uneaten

Mystery meat! Yum!


59 posted on 04/11/2011 8:56:13 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Over 2 years into the regime, and we don't even know the pres..ent's real name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
They’d probably be shocked you wanted to pay for it and weren’t demanding the school provide it for free.

Correction. I made them pay for it. Haha. They are the ones that wanted to see how many I could eat. I ran it off in gym class next block anyway (and then at bball practice).

60 posted on 04/11/2011 8:56:13 AM PDT by justice14 ("stand up defend or lay down and die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson