[Johnny B.]

P.S. - You might want to consider the AND function

If you combine the two clauses with a logical AND, you get the result that a child MUST be born outside the United States in order to be eligible to be President, which is absurd.

[DoctorBulldog]

In your original comment, your conditions for TRUE Natural Born were incomplete to begin with as you have been fooled by the Progressives into believing that only one U.S. parent (A or B) is required if a child is born on American soil (C). Therefore, I was subtly nudging you by bringing up the AND operator. I figured you were intelligent enough to pick up on that and I just didn't want to spend my Sunday afternoon leading you by the hand. But since you obviously didn't understand what I meant, here's the math with the addition of Jus Soli (C)

Born on (C) American soil AND of parents (A*B)owing sole allegiance to the United States equals TRUE.

OR

Born on (C')foreign soil under the jurisdiction of the United States AND of parents (A*B) owing sole allegiance to the United States equals TRUE.

Clarification Notes: (C') is a "NOT C" and (X) is "Don't Care."

By using an X in the following Boolean equations, I am saying that X = C or C'. I am NOT saying that X = born on foreign soil which is not under U.S. jurisdiction. The Boolean equations are:

1) (A*B)X = TRUE

- That is to say: (A*B)C= TRUE as well as (A*B)C'=TRUE. Therefore, (A*B)X = TRUE

3) ((A+B)X) = Confusion

4) ((A'*B)X) + ((A*B')X) = More confusion

Now do you understand what I was implying?

Cheers