Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Businessman's Guide to China's Collapse
WSJ ^ | 04/07/11 | JOSEPH STERNBERG

Posted on 04/10/2011 5:40:51 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

China has a skewed top-down economy that still reflects the instincts and control of the Communist Party.

Private consumption is only about 35% of the economy - a figure about half the USA’s and well below “normal” levels. “Investment” is 49% of GDP - a huge figure representing the chinese Gov’ts control over the economy at all levels.

IF China has a crisis - it will be begin in politics first, because the Communist Party and the Gov’t ARE the chinese economy/


21 posted on 04/10/2011 8:03:54 AM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Protesters versus tanks....let’s see....how did that Tiananmen Square thing turn out?


22 posted on 04/10/2011 8:08:18 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; sukhoi-30mki
Just returned this morning from a week in Beijing for work-related purposes. It was my first time in China, and I have to honestly say I was impressed. Apart from the (thoroughly atrocious) pollution, the level of infrastructure was really amazing. Not exactly Dubai level (that would be Shanghai), but can easily keep pace with any major American city. The level of opulence was also quite high, and the M&A deals and other finance deals going on were truly amazing (and I can easily see good deals coming). However, once I took some time to walk about and meet the 'normal' people who were taking buses rather than driving Maseratis, things changed a bit. Walking about the Silk Market, or driving an hour past Beijing's city limits, one meets people who are not the picture of opulence personified. A lot of these people do not even have the special passes (akin to inland visas that people from the rural areas have to get to live in the big cities) to have their child join a school. The further West you go in China the poorer things get. If the Chinese economy was to stop growing that is probably where the dislocation would stem from, particularly considering the huge disparity between cities like Beijing and Shanghai (and even tier 2 and 3 cities, some of them that are more advanced than Dallas or Chicago) and the rural hinterland that looks the same as when Mao was there.

However, if that economic dislocation doesn't come, then for certain China is the next superpower! It's really that simple. I was talking to certain gentlemen from a certain Chinese company that I can obviously not name that are setting up all these subsidiaries in the US, and it was amazing the ease at which they were doing that. The excitement in the room was palpable. Add to that all the expansion happening in Africa and Latin America, and a graph showing their frenetic rise contrasted against the slowing down (and in two cases decline) of American and European competitors showed just how things may be if the Chinese economy keeps chugging. For the life of me I cannot decipher the STUPIDITY of the West to cede Africa (almost completely) and Latin America (to a large extent) to the Chinese. Someday that will be written down as a major mistake by the West, particularly considering the abundant resources present, the geo-political advantages, and also the fact that Africa alone currently has a larger middle class than India, and a middle class that is increasing at a significant rate (hence the current Chinese one-two punch of not only taking natural resources, but also tapping into the nascent but quickly developing consumer market in sub-Saharan Africa).

Anyways, it was an enlightening (and enjoyable) trip. Very enlightening. If China does not collapse within the next 7-10 years, then it will be next to impossible for them to not to be a superpower. In some ways they already are!

23 posted on 04/10/2011 8:49:49 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

If no one is buying their lead crap or can’t afford to buy their junk, then I don’t see how they continue growing at all. Think they will nuke us for allowing their trillion dollar investment because we’ve cause the collapse of the treasuries?


24 posted on 04/10/2011 9:06:37 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

I don’t think they’ll nuke us, but they’ll move on Taiwan and possibly make very aggressive action action Japan, which would suck us immediately into WWIII.


25 posted on 04/10/2011 10:41:11 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; BobL; Big Bronson
There are 800 million Chinese people not part of the economic boom of the past 30 years who will soon ask for their ‘fair share’. Social safety net, higher wages, healthcare. Inflation, especially food prices, is heating up. Factory workers can make more money staying on the family farm. I expect China to have major social unrest within 2 years. Similar to the Mideast but on a much larger scale. (I’m in China now on business).

I agree. The most dangerous time for a government is when things are getting better, but not quickly enough and mostly only for a few.

China NEEDS to expand its middle class, consisting of its engineers and managers. In order to do that, it MUST allow some degree of free market, which results in winners and losers. To retain control, it cannot allow the Communist Party members and their families to be losers. Meanwhile, the peasants, who were raised on the slogans of Mao about egalitarianism are seeing Party members running around in cars talking on their smartphones, while peasants worry about starving if the harvest is not good.

Meanwhile, you have a middle class consisting of productive people who must give up a good chunk of their income to supporting unproductive Party leeches. The combination is not good...

26 posted on 04/10/2011 1:03:49 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
Private consumption is only about 35% of the economy - a figure about half the USA’s and well below “normal” levels. “Investment” is 49% of GDP - a huge figure representing the chinese Gov’ts control over the economy at all levels.

How much of that "investment" is being embezzled by Party members at all levels.

27 posted on 04/10/2011 1:05:56 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Someday that will be written down as a major mistake by the West, particularly considering the abundant resources present, the geo-political advantages, and also the fact that Africa alone currently has a larger middle class than India, and a middle class that is increasing at a significant rate (hence the current Chinese one-two punch of not only taking natural resources, but also tapping into the nascent but quickly developing consumer market in sub-Saharan Africa).

China is the only power that can safely invest in Africa any more.

Neither America or Europe can. We are no longer ruthless enough to be able to stop African thugs from expropriating our investments. The Chinese are. They don't CARE if they are called racist. They ARE racist, in that they believe in the inherent genetic superiority of the Han race. They even have test scores to back them up.

Meanwhile, they retain enough ruthlessness to respond violently to any attempted theft of their investments, and the Africans know it. They are shipping over tens of thousands of their young men of military age, to work in their African operations. Once a critical level is reached, they will start dealing with the native Africans similarly to how we dealt with Native Americans pre-20th-Century. And they will not give a DAMN about what the UN or World Opinion has to say about it.

28 posted on 04/10/2011 1:15:33 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Expanding on what I said, Daily Mail UK reported in 2008:
In the greatest movement of people the world has ever seen, China is secretly working to turn the entire continent into a new colony.

Reminiscent of the West's imperial push in the 18th and 19th centuries - but on a much more dramatic, determined scale - China's rulers believe Africa can become a 'satellite' state, solving its own problems of over-population and shortage of natural resources at a stroke.

With little fanfare, a staggering 750,000 Chinese have settled in Africa over the past decade. More are on the way.

The strategy has been carefully devised by officials in Beijing, where one expert has estimated that China will eventually need to send 300 million people to Africa to solve the problems of over-population and pollution.

China has a lot of equipment for fighting a land war. They don't have the amphibious capability to make an opposed landing against a place like Taiwan, but Africa does not have much of a defended coastline. They DO have enough container ships to bring several divisions and their equipment to Africa quickly if they have a place to land them, and keep them supplied if the US Navy does not choose to get into a shooting war with China.
29 posted on 04/10/2011 1:29:30 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
If no one is buying their lead crap or can’t afford to buy their junk, then I don’t see how they continue growing at all. Think they will nuke us for allowing their trillion dollar investment because we’ve cause the collapse of the treasuries?

They will spend their T-bills taking over Africa and then South America. See my prior two posts.

30 posted on 04/10/2011 1:31:28 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Interesting...I’m betting you’re on it.


31 posted on 04/10/2011 2:38:56 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I’m trying to bug out now, I think China is just as shaky as the U.S.. I’ve been reading a book called “Going Galt”, about economic survival when everything is collapsing. It’s pretty good, but damn scary. Are whole worlds are about to change radically.

https://www.createspace.com/3514336


32 posted on 04/10/2011 2:40:29 PM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Thanks for saying that.

From my name you can tell I am African, I also live in Africa. Most Westerners have very sparse knowledge of Africa and this knowledge is stuck in a time warp. Africa is changing very rapidly and only the Chinese seem to understand that.

I just visited a 10 million tonne p.a cement plant in central Nigeria and the major technical partners were Chinese (Sinoma). Travelling further down to Lagos, the Chinese are working on a huge special economic zone project, and this is just the tip of the iceberg.

I used to respect the West as strategic thinkers, now I am not too sure.


33 posted on 04/10/2011 2:42:56 PM PDT by AfricanChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Then why is Walmart investing in Sub-Saharan Africa?


34 posted on 04/10/2011 2:44:28 PM PDT by AfricanChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The author lives in fantasy land.

China is replacing America. The only nation collapsing is us.

Because we are sending everything of value - our jobs, factories and wealth to “collapsing” China, to which we owe trillions.

The author may as well write about bigfoot or ufo’s for all the reality his writing contains.


35 posted on 04/10/2011 2:45:39 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Trump 2012 - America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
One thing the Chinese government can do to get lots of colonists to Africa: tell the young people they can have more than one child once they are there. I think they will have a bunch of couples taking them up on their offer.

Once the Chinese emigrants are in Africa with their families, they will FIGHT any attempt to steal what they've built, and the Chinese government will back them (unlike American and European governments with respect to whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa).

36 posted on 04/10/2011 2:51:13 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BobL

“As to China collapsing. The government there simply won’t allow it.”

The Chinese central government has no control over whether they collapse. As long as they are an export powerhouse, they and the Chinese people will enjoy the benefits that accrue to making things that people buy. If the rest of the world stops buying, and they eventually will, there is only so much even a centrally planned government can do to stave off the inevitable collapse.

We will provide the model for central planning collapse - our Fed and it’s outrageous behavior the past few years is not so far removed from politburo-style central planning. We will survive probably without famine. The Chinese will survive, too but probably not without famine.


37 posted on 04/10/2011 3:00:25 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AfricanChristian
Then why is Walmart investing in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Yes, WalMart recently acquired South Africa's MassMart.

Two questions:

(1) From what country does WalMart get most of the products it stocks its shelves with? (Answer: China), and

(2) What would the response be of WalMart's major supplier over any seizure of those stores? (Answer: unpleasant).

38 posted on 04/10/2011 3:29:07 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Please take a step back, carefully consider your words and understand that we live in the 21st Century. Cecil Rhodes is dead (and the last major empire builders died with him).

The population of Africa is at least 1 billion, and the British will tell you that on occasion Africans can make life very difficult for outsiders (you can google “Mau Mau”).

Okay, if we assume that the Chinese will colonise all the “brain dead” Africans, how are they going to get there? Are they going to swim? Frankly speaking to get to Africa they have to pass through the Indian ocean and the the gulf, then past the Cape of Good Hope. As of present, they cannot even mount a successful operation across the straits to Taiwan. What could they do in Libya?

There is something in the Western psyche that wishes the worst for Africa, it hasn’t changed since King Leopold set up his plantations in the Congo.It doesn’t take much to bring it to the surface evidently.

But believe me, even though the daily stream of news media tells you that we are all doomed, we are not. I represent the flicker of hope that will light the African continent and I don’t care whether you believe me or think I am dumb.

And I am willing to bet all my possessions that there is a greater likelihood that your children not mine, will live under Chinese rule.


39 posted on 04/10/2011 4:25:29 PM PDT by AfricanChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
.


Honestly ... I don't think that the "Global Political Unrest" theory apples to the ChiComs ...

The Commies will butcher their own people ... by the tens of millions to survive ...

The Chinese people and peasants KNOW THIS ... they are SLAVES ... suitable to feeding to the Lions of Wealth and Greed ...

Just read about Mao's "Great Leap Foward" economic campaigns and purges ... and his "Little Red Book" ...

Stalin and Hitler smiled upwards (from Hell's Inferno) in approval and amusement ...



.
40 posted on 04/10/2011 4:36:54 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson