Posted on 04/09/2011 5:39:41 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
Let me see if I have this straight. $38 billion is six says.
$61 billion is what? Ten? Eleven says? We are talking about pennies here.
The meat is the debt ceiling...the Ryan Budget. This is the fight!
Anyone who is worried about the difference between $38 billion and $61 billion or $100 billion is as short sighted as a Democrat who thinks he can spend as much as he likes into infinity.
I said: The fight starts now.
Now is where we should be focused. Obviously, if Boehner does't see this, he will prove to be as worthless a speaker as Gingrich proved to be.
The humorous part is Gingrich thinks he is Presidential timber. How does Boehner see himself?
My experience tells me that MOST freepers think this is a long fight to the death. I wanted $100,000,000, not 61 and not 38.
Nevertheless, the real fight starts now. Before we condemn Boehner to Hades, let's see what he is made of.
Not at all. I think Boehner got the best for the moment, and should keep pushing for more from here on holding the debt ceiling battle. If we don't have the GOP's back in the debt limit debate coming up, then Shumer and Obama will roll us all.
The overwhelming complaint on FR seems to be that Boehner didn't meet the Tea Party demands...that he "caved."
And yet, for this particular round, I can't find any TEA PARTY CANDIDATE'S proposal or demand of Boehner beyond about $60 billion in "cuts."
So my question is, among all the blood-curdling cries of "Vote Boehner Out, He Caved!"....is...ok, if he had not "caved" and the Tea Party candidates had got all they asked for, they'd still only have made a minor dent in the deficit.
Yeah, sure. Most freepers want a shutdown for 2 years, save $7 trillion, or $2T in cuts this week, etc. Except that that is NOT what any Tea Party candidate asked for!
I just don't trust anyone who puts themselves on the same side as Reid Obama and Durbin and Pelosi in wanting Boehner to lose his job. It doesn't make sense.
Who’s taking credit for the spending cuts?
Who will use it in their 2012 campaign?
We lost politically.
Once again.
Because our leaders are spineless.
So my question is, among all the blood-curdling cries of “Vote Boehner Out, He Caved!”....is...ok, if he had not “caved” and the Tea Party candidates had got all they asked for, they’d still only have made a minor dent in the deficit.
Yeah, sure. Most freepers want a shutdown for 2 years, save $7 trillion, or $2T in cuts this week, etc. Except that that is NOT what any Tea Party candidate asked for!
It’s fair enough to criticize the deal without calling for Boehner to be removed as Speaker. What is bad about the deal, besides it being a paltry reduction, is that the Repukes took the only weapon they really have off the table — shutting down the gubmint.
Who will believe them if they try to block the debt ceiling increase? If they aren’t willing to go “all the way” now, then when?
As for Boehner specifically, he was some sort of middling compromise candidate for Speaker to begin with. The Demoviks got control of the House and went right for the throat making a real leftie from their most leftie district Speaker.
“Our” side could have countered 4 years later with Bachmann but the Repukes are timid, rubber-legged and feckless.
The fact is, whether we stand by them or not, the Repuke is an endangered species. We’re too near Oblivion now as a nation to imagine that “compromising” with Marxists is a meaningful strategy. Marxism has to be overthrown. Not negotiated into a lesser evil.
All that said, I hope Boehner justifies your faith in him and can deliver something meaningful between now and the end — or, the re-birth.
Well said.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.