910 abortions a day , but they put out all this Bullsh!t about how many Mammograms they do and about how that is their major job saving women from cancer.
They sure don’t do 910 Mammograms a day.
Certainly their main objective is as an abortion Mill. Killing murdering slaughtering, and friggin lying is their major function, and the Congress is right there with them. Democrats who vote for it and Republicans who’s major function is to fool us into thinking they are going to do something about. Eff them all.
Thanks for nothing , Bend Over Boehner.
Boehner is a SOCIALIST first and foremost, so I am not surprised by the outcome.
They could have stopped Obamacare had they wanted to, but they didn’t.
They will never defund or repeal Obama’s socialist agenda, but will do what it takes to move it forward.
Thousands of unborn babies will never be available for comment on Boehner’s Budget Blunder.
“The upcoming Senate vote for the stand alone bill is a sham that let Boehner off the hook”
Practically every bill that Boehner has been involved with this year has been a sham, when you reflect on it.
This was their one chance to cut off funding for Planned Parenthood, and they blew it.
There isn’t a chance in hell that a separate bill will be passed. Even if the Senate caves, which is unlikely, Obama will veto it.
Obama is the guy who voted three times as a state legislator to kill babies who are born alive. He wouldn’t hesitate for an instant to veto any bill to defund PP.
And Boehner certainly knows it. Thanks, you bloody-handed jerk, but this little “symbolic” measure will not save your sorry *ss from getting the boot in the next election.
Cry me a river!
The article makes it sound like cutting the funding, would decrease the number of abortions PP performs. But that's simply not the case.
People are becoming aware of this issue. Yesterday when I checked google trends “Planned parenthood” was high up, as was “government shutdown”.
I hate to see people approve of PP, but what really toasts my cookies is the media spin about it.
For instance, the ABC piece about cutting military pay was written so convoluted so as to not be clear that Obama was the one in the way of it, in order to get more funding for PP. I’d like to think the reporter was just a bad writer but I’m sure she was trying to be deceptive.
Well, you have to pick your battles and when you fight.
Bohner is still our best hope for the time being. Don’t eat your young.
Planned Parenthood is the business model for nationalized healthcare. One stop shop from cradle to grave. They will rebrand it, but the money has been promised and deals have been struck. The franchaise is already in place.
Boehner has just been rolled, and if he does not find the backbone to get this tiny thing done, then he won’t have the backbone for the heavy lifting.
Look what his caving gave us to pay interest to the Chinese on..it is FR posted.
US to fund $20m remake of Sesame Street for Pakistan
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13015768
Why? It would have to get through the Senate anyway.
What folks need to focus on is another story entirely. First off, the Title X funds were never up for cuts, just Planned Parenthood getting a portion of them. So why not give PP tax dollars? How about this: GAO found PP misplaced $1.3 BILLION between 2003 and 2008.
Tax dollars should go to responsible clinics which PP clearly is not.
I’m confused. I thought under the Hyde Act, it was illegal for abortions to be paid for with taxpayer dollars. I was directed to a website that states that “only 3% of the organization’s work is related to terminating pregnancies,”
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_04/028869.php
So my question is, if it’s illegal for PP to use taxpayer money for abortions, why are they getting away with it? Just because they’re leftists?
