Replies

There is more to this situation than most people imagine. (Keep in mind, lawyers are involved!)

To quote Factcheck.org: “As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”

So, why would Obama feel that his birth status was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 rather than by the 14th Amendment to the United States of America?

If Barry’s parents were indeed married in Hawaii, that marriage would not be recognized by Great Britain because it was invalid - Obama Sr. was already married with a wife and child living in Kenya. So, as per the British Nationality Act of 1948, any subsequent children born to this bigamist marriage would be considered illegitimate and NOT British subjects.

Just to be upfront, I believe that Obama was not born in Hawaii but born in Mombassa, Kenya, in 1961; my belief is based on the presence of a missionary woman, an American, who was there and helped Stanley Ann Dunham Obama return to the U.S. after Barry’s birth.

If Barry’s parents were indeed married in Hawaii, that marriage would not be recognized by Great Britain because it was invalid - Obama Sr. was already married with a wife and child living in Kenya. So, as per the British Nationality Act of 1948, any subsequent children born to this bigamist marriage would be considered illegitimate and NOT British subjects.

Speaking of illegitimate, I was born in Dallas, Texas in 1952, and on my birth certificate there is a conspicuous item with two check boxes: LEGITIMATE YES NO. Maybe that's what's being hidden?

Yes. The curious thing is that IF Obama was born in Hawaii, then he is illegitimate. Because Hawaii, and the U.S. as a whole, does not allow someone to marry a second wife without divorcing the first.

IF Obama was born in the Coast Province, then the marriage could be considered legitimate, because the British authorities there had earlier agreed to recognize Sharia Law for Muslims residing in that province, and Sharia Law permits Muslims to have four wives.

Certainly there was no such thing as Sharia Law in Hawaii. And the case of the Mormons had earlier established that belonging to a religion that permitted multiple marriages would not be recognized within the United States.

Actually, I think that the chances that Obama was born in Hawaii are just about zero. But if he was, as the leftists all insist without any evidence, then he is the illegitimate son of a citizen of the British colony of Kenya. Not a natural born citizen.

But more likely not a citizen at all. But an illegal alien, British, Kenyan, and/or Indonesian.

I tend to agree with your take on the situation. There are many dots to be connected , some are probably extraneous but some are probably telling as to real importance. Among my many dots are Rahm Immanual taking an African vacation with side trip to Kenya about the time two relief ships (one was in trouble with pirates for a few days) were going to Kenya. It was also at this time that the Kenya government closed down all public notices and celebrations about Obama being born in Kenya. Perhaps Trump is the person who can connect all the dots about Obama and his enablers. I would also like to know if Trump is beholden in any way to European banker’s(including the Rothchilds)for his investments. I believe a person has to be free of such to be good for the USA.