Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Got a Better Plan? Dems think Ryan's budget is too radical. Do they have a better alternative?
National Review ^ | 04/08/2011 | Rich Lowrey

Posted on 04/08/2011 7:49:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

One of House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan’s favorite phrases is “adult conversation.” As in, we need to have an adult conversation about the nation’s fiscal challenges. With the release of his budget resolution, Ryan is beginning the discussion even if his purported conversational partners on the other side of the aisle insist on banging their cups on their highchairs and wailing.

Three inescapable realities drive the federal budget: We spend too much on health care, we are growing older, and we face an alarming federal debt. Ryan is daring to tell the country how he’d react to this in a stark instance of reality-based budgeting. His implicit challenge to those who reject his solution is, “Fine, what’s yours?”

Health-care costs are far outpacing inflation, and Medicare is growing at twice the rate of the economy. The two trends are related: Medicare’s blank-check payment system contributes to soaring medical costs. Beginning in 2022, Ryan would give new Medicare beneficiaries a subsidy to buy their own insurance. It would bring consumer choice and competitive pressure to an area sorely lacking them. Maybe you think this reform of Medicare — which has an ungodly unfunded liability over the next 75 years — is too radical. Fine, what’s yours?

As we age as a society, the burden of maintaining our old-age entitlements falls more heavily on young workers. The Ryan budget notes that in 1950, 16.5 workers supported each Social Security recipient. In 2000, it was 3.4 workers. In 2040, it will be 2.1. Ryan’s budget would force the president, working with Social Security’s trustees, to submit a proposal to right the program’s fiscal balance. This path might strike you as too timid — or too bold. Fine, what’s yours?

The Ryan budget controls federal spending and brings it below 20 percent of GDP by 2015. It reduces the deficit $4.4 trillion compared with Pres. Barack Obama’s budget over the next ten years and reaches so-called primary balance — a balanced budget outside of interest payments on the debt — by 2015. Obama would keep adding to the debt at a prodigious clip, almost doubling it from its current $14 trillion to $26 trillion over ten years. Perhaps Ryan’s method of controlling the debt is not to your liking. Fine, what’s yours?

Ryan keeps tax revenue at the historic level of roughly 18 percent, and brings both the top personal and the top corporate tax rates down to 25 percent while eliminating deductions and loopholes. This reform — designed to make the tax code simpler and more pro-growth — might strike you as “unfair.” Fine, what’s yours?

The unspoken Democratic answer to all of the above questions is yet more taxes, coupled with price controls on health care. Democrats don’t want to be frank about it for political reasons. They cover for their own substantive vacuity with evasions and crude attacks on Ryan’s proposal as a budgetary death panel. Such is the lot of the adult in the room.

Paul Ryan is Washington’s answer to those Republican grown-ups out in the states, Govs. Mitch Daniels of Indiana and Chris Christie of New Jersey. They all drench themselves in the details of policy, are unafraid to speak hard truths, and — in their own ways, in keeping with their different personalities — relish the art of public persuasion. No wonder the three of them are so often mentioned wistfully as (unlikely) potential presidential candidates.

As the chief executives of their states, Daniels and Christie have more power to enact policy into law than does Ryan. His budget is fundamentally an exemplary exercise. It demonstrates a comprehensive solution to the nation’s fiscal condition, without tax increases and without more heavy-handed government intervention in health care. Ryan needn’t sweep all before him to succeed, but merely survive — accomplishment enough, given his frankness on entitlements — to pass the baton to a Republican presidential candidate.

Perhaps you think this isn’t the best way to start an “adult conversion.” Fine, what’s yours?

— Rich Lowry is editor of National Review.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budgetplan; democrats; paulryan

1 posted on 04/08/2011 7:49:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Raise Taxes, Cut Defense. Expand Government.


2 posted on 04/08/2011 7:51:47 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Obama Sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Conservatives are under attack! Liberals are attacking 10 conservatives, criticizing their courage to address entitlements and stand up for our children’s future. Don’t let liberals put politics ahead of good policy, call 1-866-644-5729 today and tell your representative:


3 posted on 04/08/2011 7:52:02 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

if not I guess they’re just the part of NO...


4 posted on 04/08/2011 7:52:41 AM PDT by bigbob (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

It’s gotta work better than the truth!

;-)


5 posted on 04/08/2011 7:55:02 AM PDT by WayneS (Hey, sometimes I read the article, sometimes I only read the headline... So SUE me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ryan’s budget is to radical?.....That’s a funny statement coming from radicals....


6 posted on 04/08/2011 7:56:37 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Party who wouldn’t pass a budget when they controlled everything criticizes Ryan’s budget proposal?


7 posted on 04/08/2011 7:58:10 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Exactly, thats what they ALWAYS do, just look back to the last Congress.


8 posted on 04/08/2011 8:08:03 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 556x45

Now they are whining about every little government payoff to the Democrat voters. Shut it down! We do not have to watch the MSM Pity Parties and Sob Stories. The Masters is on. Shut them down!


9 posted on 04/08/2011 8:17:26 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Obama Sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here’s my plan:

Have Uncle Sam get out of the retirement business entirely by paying off all current SS recipients and would-be recipients over 55 with a lump sum, much like companies do when they offer early retirement. In lieu of cash, Uncle Sam could give title to parcels of Federal property or other valuable assets, which the recipient could sell or keep. How about a nice view lot in Yellowstone Park? Repeal SS taxes and close out the SSA entirely. Result: a major tax burden would be lifted, improving the investment climate, which means more jobs for everyone.

Raise cash for the Social Security liquidation by having Fannie & Freddy offer mortgage-holders a chance to purchase the balance owed on their mortgages at cut rate prices, say 25 to 50 cents on the dollar. Once the cash is raised during a time window, say 1 year, close out Fannie & Freddy. More folks would own their homes free & clear and the vacant properties now owned by Fannie & Freddy would be offered at fire-sale prices, getting them off the market and allowing the remaining homes to appreciate again. Net result: seniors get cash, many homeowners get a mortgage-free house, government gets out of the mortgage business, liberties are preserved, and many people get a fresh start.

This would be the American equivalent of a Year of Jubilee as described in the Bible - a once-in 50-year event during which all debts were cancelled and land sold as payment for debt was conveyed back to the original owners.


10 posted on 04/08/2011 8:53:50 AM PDT by bopdowah ("Unlike King Midas, whatever the Gubmint touches sure don't turn to Gold!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson