I agree with all you say, but I was thinking more in terms of them pulling out those votes now before their canvass is in. That makes it easier for the judges to go along with it, too.
After the canvass, it’s just a matter of getting the judges to rule their way on the provisionals and....voila! They win.
Yes, I agree 25k is kind of a tall order, but certainly doable. Believable? No. But a lefty judge in a lefty county has nothing to worry about if he goes with the left’s position. He doesn’t care if it’s believable.
Canvass was supposed to have finished yesterday at 5:00 pm and the news of the screw-up did not leak into the press before that deadline. That is what makes this so delicious. The ‘rats did not know they had a problem until after it was too late to easily fix it. Now they have to depend solely on provisionals or (maybe) rejecting absentee ballots.
“After the canvass, it’s just a matter of getting the judges to rule their way on the provisionals and....voila! They win.
Yes, I agree 25k is kind of a tall order, but certainly doable. Believable? No. But a lefty judge in a lefty county has nothing to worry about if he goes with the left’s position. He doesn’t care if it’s believable.”
But the ultimate arbiter on all of these decisions is the WSC. And they do not want to look like a clown posse, regardless of their political beliefs. Lower judges will have to use a uniform standard for accepting/rejecting provisionals. You can push the count 1000 or so either way, but to get 7000 with a uniform set of standards is not really likely. Possible, but not probable.