Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
"........but said his sexuality was irrelevant in deciding the landmark case"
HE must be EPICALLY STUPID to think that WE are actually stupid enough to believe that BS. More liberal activist judges legislatiing from the bench. He should have immediately recused himself from ruling on this, because he could not possibly be impartial.
To: Free ThinkerNY
This guy should have recused himself. Especially since he decided in the manner that he did.
3 posted on
04/07/2011 5:47:54 PM PDT by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: Free ThinkerNY
The federal judge who struck down California's gay marriage ban has confirmed longtime rumors that he's gay, but said his sexuality was irrelevant in deciding the landmark case.R-I-G-H-T ... and there really is an Easter Bunny and a Tooth Fairy.
4 posted on
04/07/2011 5:48:06 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
5 posted on
04/07/2011 5:48:59 PM PDT by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
"Oh, I've had such a morning in the High Court. I could stamp my little feet. . . ."
To: FReepers
Liberals Have Plans To Indoctrinate Our Children
Stop Them
Click The Pic
Become A Monthly Donor
7 posted on
04/07/2011 5:50:56 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
If he had ruled AGAINST gay marriage, then his sexuality would not have been an issue.
But that didn’t happen.
8 posted on
04/07/2011 5:51:29 PM PDT by
BobL
(PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts))
To: Free ThinkerNY
9 posted on
04/07/2011 5:54:37 PM PDT by
Spruce
To: Free ThinkerNY
"Walker said he never considered recusing himself from deciding the constitutionality of Proposition 8 because of his sexual orientation"
If he never even considered it, he was a pathetically horrible judge.
10 posted on
04/07/2011 5:55:07 PM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(Public employee unions are the barbarian hordes of our time.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Two words: forum shopping.
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that this particular case came before this particular judge.
12 posted on
04/07/2011 5:58:05 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
(The corollary to "If it's not close they can't cheat" is "If it is close they will definitely cheat")
To: Free ThinkerNY
Its hard to concentrate about serious issues when you are sitting upon a live gerbil.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Vaughn like Justice Souter were liberal sleeper cells both named by G.H.W Bush. Call him and his family RINOs or just country club Republicans they left a trail of wreckage to establish their bona fides before the NYT. No wonder they dumped on Sarah from their high and mighty perch. And , yeah, voted for all of them, but I’m glad their dynasty is history and the GOP is getting an infusion of new blood.
15 posted on
04/07/2011 6:04:20 PM PDT by
Calusa
(The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles. Quoth Bob Dylan.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Proposition 8 was an amendment to the California Constitution, was it not? So basically the judge ruled that the Constitution can’t be amended?
18 posted on
04/07/2011 6:14:14 PM PDT by
jtal
To: Free ThinkerNY
A violation of judicial ethics. Being gay doesn’t exempt you from the ethics code.
19 posted on
04/07/2011 6:15:32 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Democrats = authoritarian socialists)
To: Free ThinkerNY
what? No!
His decision was so unbiased, I never would have guessed.
/sarc
21 posted on
04/07/2011 6:20:30 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Sitting judges, even Round Mouthed judges like this one, are supposed to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.
This has far more than the mere appearance of impropriety. Judge Round Mouth voted his gonadal urges. Period. Full stop.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Confirms it?!?!?
Heck, it was well known at the time!
24 posted on
04/07/2011 6:53:46 PM PDT by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Sodomy/buggery > Ethics/fidelity to legal principle.
That a gay judge could overrule a vote of the citizens on gay marriage should be something that would have us up in arms, literally.
But it’s just another day in the decline of a civilization.
25 posted on
04/07/2011 6:54:24 PM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
What a ridiculous situation
27 posted on
04/07/2011 6:54:50 PM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Almost as surprised as when I found out that the Pope was Catholic.
31 posted on
04/07/2011 7:37:59 PM PDT by
reg45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson