Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

Perot would have been better than clinton or papa nwo bush.


11 posted on 04/07/2011 4:19:39 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: GlockThe Vote

Bush 1 DID NOT DESERVE to be re-elected. Having a Republican who gives the democraps everythign they want is worse than having a democrap.

Clinton was a democrap.. nuff said.

Perot was the only choice out of the 3.

He may have helped elect Clinton, but with no mandate Clinton (THANK GOD~!) gave us a GOP controlled congress for the first time in 40 years.

And Clinton and the GOP Congress gave us a balanaced budget.


47 posted on 04/07/2011 6:05:26 AM PDT by Mr. K (Job #1 DEFUND THE LEFT Palin/Bachman 2012 -Unbeatable Ticket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson