Suing the body of man dead for 23 years? What could they get?
I know, it's the headline - it's awful.
1 posted on
04/06/2011 3:31:57 AM PDT by
raybbr
To: raybbr
It’s the hospital that is the defendant.
2 posted on
04/06/2011 3:38:11 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: raybbr
The Hospital is responsible?
Where were the parents?
To: raybbr
I hate bad journalism. Headline offenders are the worst.
4 posted on
04/06/2011 4:03:36 AM PDT by
CalvaryJohn
(What is keeping that damned asteroid?)
To: raybbr
Reardon died in 1988 Did he stay alive long enough for a criminal trial?
5 posted on
04/06/2011 4:13:58 AM PDT by
Graybeard58
(Of course Obama loves his country. The thing is, Sarah loves mine.)
To: raybbr
It seems as though the plaintiff has a case only if the plaintiff can prove someone on the hospital staff, other than Reardon, knew the sexual abuse was occurring.
Two interesting questions are, would it be an effective legal strategy for the hospital to file a law suit against the parents for not telling the hospital given St. Francis's contention they didn't know because the parents didn't tell the hospital? Don't the parents have at least some culpability?
To: raybbr
9 posted on
04/06/2011 4:32:19 AM PDT by
BilLies
(r)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson