Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/04/2011 10:22:45 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

$61 billion is a start in the right direction. Wish it was more, but I’ll take it as a first step in what is sure to be a very long trek to restoring fiscal sanity.


2 posted on 04/04/2011 10:35:44 PM PDT by DemforBush (Of all the Thompson gunners, Roland was the best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I will officially answer:

It is HARDLY ENOUGH. It is a mere starting point. If any republican leader thinks this is enough, they better take pictures of the Capitol right now because they aren’t going to be there come January 2013.


3 posted on 04/04/2011 10:36:01 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

As of yet not one dime has been cut from authorized spending. So I will believe it when I see it.


5 posted on 04/05/2011 1:37:17 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

$61 billion is what should be getting cut from each of these 2-week CRs that that are passing.


6 posted on 04/05/2011 2:53:51 AM PDT by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It should be $500billion a year to be confident of avoiding default.


7 posted on 04/05/2011 3:20:58 AM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Soundbites make this a lot easier to understand than it really is.

We “know” that we spent 800 billion on TARP — but it turns out in the end that TARP is well less than 100 billion. How? Because it was loan guarantees, and loans, and purchases of stocks and equity interests, and as the economy didn’t collapse we are unwinding those instruments and most of the money never really “left”. So while the budget looked bad, it wasn’t like we really spent twice our previous budget.

Also, we had two really bad years where we didn’t get tax revenues. That has been getting better, so while we reject “tax increase”, tax revenue is increasing. Part of the deficit from Obama wasn’t him spending more money, but us getting less money.

Getting back to 2008 levels of spending might be good enough, if we also can get rid of the anti-business regulation put in place by the democrats; 2008 spending was too high relative to what the economy generated, but the economy should be able to grow, and increase revenue that way without raising taxes.

If you had told people before the election that we would be able to freeze spending, and then reduce it by 33 billion in THIS fiscal year, I think people would have been extatic. After all, this is a budget year entirely controled by Democrats. They had a huge house majority, and a filibuster-proof senate. They were able to pass Obamacare without any republicans, they could have passed a budget without us, spending as much as they wanted to. And it’s not like they would have lost MORE than 64 seats if they had.

So we need to focus on 2012 — that’s our budget, and it has to be good, and Paul Ryan is doing real work there. But this year — it’s gravy. We have a chance to do something about the runaway spending, and it’s a lucky break for us, and it shouldn’t turn into a way for democrats to split us apart and beat us.


8 posted on 04/05/2011 8:41:24 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson