-—————I have a different idea than they do, so by definition, I’m right.-—————
Your idea isn’t in motivation anywhere except on here or a handful of other forums.
Everywhere you look at all levels of government,(and the media, and academia too, it seems) the marxist version of net neutrality is what’s in motion. That’s what makes you wrong. They never intended on ever doing the net neutrality that they sold you on.
-————Such is the radical “Marxist” thought of Thomas Jefferson.-——————
This is idiocy. Thomas Jefferson didn’t run around with the totalitarians. He opposed them.
Tim Wu runs around with the totalitarians. He is a totalitarian.
http://www.freepress.net/node/39317
That’s him. That’s the marxist group free press.
You won’t look at Tim Wu because you don’t want to see the obvious. That’s why you keep using vapid unspecific talking points about corporations to support your groundless position.
Marxists produce marxism. Have fun arguing otherwise.
You still seem to think Marxism is the only kind of totalitarianism. Marxism didn't even exist at the time of Jefferson, but powerful corporations certainly did, and Jefferson clearly opposed them abusing their power.
In addition, while a corporation that has gotten its power through the market can be bad, it isn't by definition bad. IMHO, one that has gotten its power through government favor is definitely very bad. This was the corporate tea monopoly opposed by our Founders, this is the cable monopolies opposed by the liks of me.