>> Bush is NO Reagan.
Never claimed he was.
But I would take Bush back right now over Obama. In a heartbeat.
I lived through the Carter years. I would have taken Bush hands down over Carter.
Clintoon was a politically astute triangulator, and a passably competent executive, but as a human being he was (and is) an evil, low-integrity corrupt horndog. W made mistakes, but they were not mistakes of integrity or character. As POTUS, I’d take W the man over Clintoon the man any day of the week.
Your argument seems not related to the man in the executive role, but rather to some bizarre systemic evaluation of the universe during and after the man’s term. You seem pathologically incapable of admitting e.g. that Obama is an unmitigated EVIL POS. The fact that the current congress isn’t letting him score on his evil has NOTHING to do with whether or not he is, in fact, the POS that Bush was not.
It makes me wonder about you, frankly. I’ll chalk it up to sophistry and love of a convoluted argument, and not lack of a conservative core ideology. Especially since I took that “political leanings” test and discovered that I come out almost exactly the same place as you did. :-)
FRegards
wonder all you want. I am not loyal to Republicans just for being Republicans and I expect MORE from them than Democrats because correct or incorrect, they represent different things symbolically and have different side effects. Loyalty to the R party is what got us here.
A Republican president that has two Democrat congressional sweeps in his second term is a failure, especially when he had his own party congress for almost six years. It doesnt take any specific world view to understand this.
Let me throw one at you you probably wont like : Things would have been even worse now if Mccain won in 2008 , and I am still glad he is not president.