To: Graybeard58
Well, here's the kicker:
But the tax law allows parents who adopt "special needs" children to receive the entire credit even if they had no expenses.
11 posted on
04/02/2011 11:09:56 AM PDT by
Graybeard58
(Of course Obama loves his country. The thing is, Sarah loves mine.)
To: Graybeard58
For once I’m on the government side, if these children were in the system they were costing way more than 13k per year so it is probably a net savings for the government.
18 posted on
04/02/2011 11:16:17 AM PDT by
tiki
To: Graybeard58
If people will stop and think...the tax credit gets special needs children out of expensive institutions. Good for the child and good for taxpayers. I don’t like government involvement in these things, until we can get the government out fo the social welfare business, this saves taxpayers money.
21 posted on
04/02/2011 11:19:49 AM PDT by
achilles2000
("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
To: Graybeard58
My neighbors across the street are doing this. An investigator for the State of Texas came by asking us questions about them a month or so ago. The lady who is on the lease is claiming that she's unmarried. Her husband lives there with here, along with about 8 other children. One of them is special needs. All are foster kids. None of the adults work. They have destroyed the house (which is quite a bit nicer and more expensive than my house), and the special needs girl (about 4 years old) runs around the neighborhood naked.
I tell you, I'm glad I have a job, because they are dependent upon me to pay for their lifestyle.
43 posted on
04/02/2011 11:51:28 AM PDT by
GOPyouth
("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson