1. No I didn't. (Every argument with a Birther eventually becomes ad hominem, as they are unmoved by facts, logic or history.) I pointed out a very simple fact. The "dual citizenship" that Birthers get their shorts in a knot over would not exist if you reverse the citizenship of BO's parents. That is a fact, not a hypothetical. Oh sure, there are still Birther theories that would disqualify him, but you wouldn't be bleating about dual citizenship if BO wasn't born a dual citizen. And he wouldn't have been born a dual citizen, and wouldn't be (in Birther fantasy) disqualified from the Presidency due to dual citizenship, if his mamma, and not his daddy, had been a Brit. So you believe that British law can disqualify someone from being President of the United States.
2. "Dude." Read what you just posted. [Y]ou make up a hypothetical situation and then ask me to DISPROVE something which doesn’t exist? Can you better describe the Kenyan/Canadian/Alpha Centurion Birth theories of Birtherism?
“1. No I didn’t. (Every argument with a Birther eventually becomes ad hominem, as they are unmoved by facts, logic or history.) I pointed out a very simple fact. The “dual citizenship” that Birthers get their shorts in a knot over would not exist if you reverse the citizenship of BO’s parents. That is a fact, not a hypothetical. Oh sure, there are still Birther theories that would disqualify him, but you wouldn’t be bleating about dual citizenship if BO wasn’t born a dual citizen. And he wouldn’t have been born a dual citizen, and wouldn’t be (in Birther fantasy) disqualified from the Presidency due to dual citizenship, if his mamma, and not his daddy, had been a Brit. So you believe that British law can disqualify someone from being President of the United States.”
Ok, Here we go. it is irrelevant whether it was Obama’s mother who was British, or his father. COMPLETELY. The child of a British woman is going to inherit his mother’s citizenship. The child is STILL born under the jurisdictions of two Nations. Or did Britain have laws saying women do not pass their citizenship to their children. The children of women do not have citizenship? Are you serious? Really??
Regardless, we aren’t speaking of hypotheticals. Obama admits he was born under the Jurisdiction of Great Britain, while being born in Hawaii. Even my 5 year old can see that there are TWO things going on here, the 1948 BNA and born in Hawaii.
Do you often tilt at windmills like this? How is that on your back? It must be kinda rough....
Anyway, your number2 - well, you seem to buying into an insanity far far more insane and rediculus. So I would have to advise you to look into a mirror on that one.
I am saying that Natural Born Citizenship means being born under the sole jurosdiction of One Nation. In this case, America. There are MANY historical records which display that EXACT concept. Going back to Vattel, all the way up to the debates on the 14th Amendment, to statements made by the author of that Amendment. And into the 1920’s and 30’s... there is SO MUCH historical evidence to the defination I gave you, it is utterly LAUGHABLE that you are trying to deny it!
Beerman.... I am sorry. Your paradigm does not exist. Reality and history prove themselves, and they do NOT equal what you attempt to assert.