This "seniority" thing I have been hearing on FR is getting just a little bit old. Especially when the OWNER of the site has declared it Palin Country. Two PDSers (one a long-time member, pissant) have been zotted with extreme prejudice. I have YET to see a Sarah Palin supporter on FR zotted.
So, seniority would seem to matter on FR somewhat less than your opinion on a given issue or person. And I would say that as an opponent of Sarah Palin, your seniority will not protect you if you go the pissant route.
Sorry, 2ndDivisionVet and VirginiaRidgeRunner, I held off responding to the trolls as long as I humanly could...
“I got kicked out of. I got kicked off the high school debate team for saying “Yeah? Well F$%K you!” I thought I had won, ‘cause the other kid was *speechless*. I thought that's what we were trying to do.” Ron White.
That is not what debate is about.
Oh and as far as your inference that I am a troll. Real funny stuff - is that you have to debate? Want to talk facts or just name call like most Palinista. Is you princess so weak she cannot take any scrutiny on a conservative web site? You think you have to run to Palin’s defense every time she is attacked? What a joke. Some Palinista even wrote on FR that Palin was a big a victim of the shooting in Tucson as the wounded. What insane drivel.
Here I will start a real debate.
As things are now, Palin will not be the next President of the US.
Why? Because she has a solid disapproval rating among indentendents that stays in the 30 plus % range. No one can be president with number in their disfavor. I do not care who they are or what party they are from.
The US will not elect a female or minority as president after O. It will go back to a middle aged white man. Modern (last 100 years) political history says that.
Oh and history and citizenship has a great deal to do with how I rate FReepers. You claim to be an engineer. Is your rating system based upon + if the support Palin and - (reject data) if they do not?