To: ReneeLynn
Actually, it's not just PA or AK. 44 out of 50 states have such deals in place, making this criticism even more ludicrous.
8 posted on
03/30/2011 6:48:39 AM PDT by
Anamnesis
To: Anamnesis
Yes. Bringing IN revenue to any state seems to be a crime now. They’re acting as if Sarah has personally benefitted instead of the state.
10 posted on
03/30/2011 6:51:02 AM PDT by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it's the new black. Mmm mmm mmm...)
To: Anamnesis
“44 out of 50 states have such deals in place”
It’s likely true that if Alaska didn’t take the money, some other state would get it. If that’s the case then it’s a no-brainer for any State government.
13 posted on
03/30/2011 6:54:39 AM PDT by
frposty
(I'm a simpleton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson