Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Approves Constitutional Ban on Gay Marriage
wibc.com ^ | 03/30/2011 | Eric Berman

Posted on 03/30/2011 5:07:30 AM PDT by massmike

The Senate voted 40-10 to constitutionally ban same-sex marriage. Three Democrats joined every Senate Republican in voting yes.

Auburn Republican Dennis Kruse, who sponsored the amendment, says the 25-year-old state law banning gay marriage belongs in the constitution.

"The family is the basic unit of our society, and has been since Adam and Eve (were) created," Kruse says. "Marriage is, and should be, the union of one man and one woman."

Opponents contend the tide of public opinion has turned in favor of gay marriage since the amendment fight started six years ago, and that the trend is accelerating. They point to polls showing pluralities in favor of same-sex marriage in Indiana and nationally, and argue opposition to a ban is even stronger among younger Americans.

Supporters of a ban counter that all 30 states which have put the ban on the ballot have approved it, although Arizona needed two tries to do so.

The House had approved the proposal 70-26 last month. The Senate vote completes the first step in the amendment process.

Legislators must now wait till after next year's election, then approve it again in 2013 or 2014. Voters would then get the final say in the fall election in 2014.

(Excerpt) Read more at wibc.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; indiana; indianasenate

1 posted on 03/30/2011 5:07:32 AM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike

This would be the State of Indiana FYI.


2 posted on 03/30/2011 5:09:26 AM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: acapesket; massmike

Should be in the title for clarity.


3 posted on 03/30/2011 5:15:06 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Excellent.


4 posted on 03/30/2011 5:18:44 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

It sucks they have to pass it again in 2013.

If the Democrats take over, its DOA.


5 posted on 03/30/2011 5:26:15 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Auburn Republican Dennis Kruse, who sponsored the amendment, says the 25-year-old state law banning gay marriage belongs in the constitution.

It belongs in the Constitution at the state level and not at the federal level.

6 posted on 03/30/2011 5:30:19 AM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

My tide hasn’t turned yet and it isn’t going to.

Homosexual marriage is a farce.

What they do with themselves in the darkis their business, when they bring it out into the daylight by teaching it in schools, expecting straight people to accept their perversions, claiming to be married , it becomes mine, and I am against it.


7 posted on 03/30/2011 5:34:06 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
It sucks they have to pass it again in 2013.

I don't know of any rational state where an amendment like this has had a problem passing. And I don't see Indiana going bat-sh*t crazy like Massachussetts or California over the next two years.

8 posted on 03/30/2011 5:36:32 AM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massmike; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

This is interesting. The author carefully points out that Supporters of a ban counter that all 30 states which have put the ban on the ballot have approved it.

This website,NCSL, states that Thirty-seven states currently have statutory Defense of Marriage Acts, while wikipedia states that As of March 2011, 41 states prohibit same-sex marriage via state statutes or state constitutions.and that 28 states have approved constitutional amendments .

9 posted on 03/30/2011 6:54:56 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If the Democrats take over, its DOA.

Voters need to know this. They need to know who the Party of Perversion is.

10 posted on 03/30/2011 6:56:27 AM PDT by fwdude (The world is sleeping in the dark that the Church just can't fight, 'cause it's asleep in the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater
I don't know of any rational state where an amendment like this has had a problem passing.

Most people considered Iowa to be a rational state, and yet, they can't get a referendum approval past one house or another. Indiana had a chance years ago, but Democrat majorities kept it from going before the voters. It can happen again in 2 years, if the voters don't wise up.

11 posted on 03/30/2011 7:07:49 AM PDT by fwdude (The world is sleeping in the dark that the Church just can't fight, 'cause it's asleep in the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater; DJ MacWoW
It belongs in the Constitution at the state level and not at the federal level.

******************************

It belongs at the federal level. The intent of the homosexual agenda is to destroy marriage.

12 posted on 03/30/2011 7:13:44 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trisham
It belongs at the federal level. The intent of the homosexual agenda is to destroy marriage.

Issuing marriage licenses and regulating them is a state matter.

13 posted on 03/30/2011 7:26:32 AM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater; trisham
Issuing marriage licenses and regulating them is a state matter.

Which is why the homosexual activists are using federal power and the courts to subvert the will of the people. Fight them on their ground or lose.

14 posted on 03/30/2011 7:28:41 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater

Doesn’t matter.


15 posted on 03/30/2011 7:40:28 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

It’s impossible to manage on a state level, because every few years some idiot will file a bill to change it, and create anarchy. It’s insane to have the kind of legal chaos that would result. It has to be done on a federal level.


16 posted on 03/30/2011 7:43:32 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Yes. Look what happened to Prop 8.


17 posted on 03/30/2011 8:01:45 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Exactly! Look at what happened here in Massachusetts. We’re not able to take a vote on it, and the tactics of the Left are incredibly dirty.


18 posted on 03/30/2011 8:13:06 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Opponents contend the tide of public opinion has turned in favor of gay marriage since the amendment fight started six years ago, and that the trend is accelerating. They point to polls showing pluralities in favor of same-sex marriage in Indiana and nationally, and argue opposition to a ban is even stronger among younger Americans.

Propaganda. The only poll that matters is the one evidenced in state and federal legislation and the one evidenced in ballot initiatives. Homosexual sex and any supposed 'marriage' premised upon homosexual sex has been historically rejected by society and declared self destructive -- without value -- something to prohibit not something to promote. It is a sickness that these leftists promote because they themselves are a sickness.

19 posted on 03/30/2011 1:27:31 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson