Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sumi blocks further implementation of collective bargaining bill (Judicial Overreach!)
Wispolitics dot com ^ | 3-29-11 | Andy Szal

Posted on 03/29/2011 5:08:09 PM PDT by bigbob

Dane County Judge Maryann Sumi issued an order this afternoon blocking further implementation of the collective bargaining bill.

Sumi stopped short of signing off on a proposed declaration that publication by the Legislative Reference Bureau does not make the law take effect. But she made clear during her ruling that "further implementation of the act is enjoined."

The judge reiterated that lawmakers could easily implement the law through another, properly noticed committee hearing and legislative vote, commenting that "when taxpayers are paying the bill, that needs to be part of the discussion" of continuing litigation.

Sumi also warned that those who act "in willful defiance of a court order" not only may subject themselves to sanctions, but endanger the financial and governmental health of the state.

Dane Co. DA Ishmael Ozanne requested that the order include the declaration that the law was not in effect, saying, "We believe there's a strong public interest in people knowing today ... what the status is."

Sumi struck that portion of the order, saying that testimony on that issue has not concluded. The case is set to resume Friday.

Assistant AG Steven Means said after the ruling that the state's position remains that the budget repair bill is the law of the land following publication by LRB.

-- By Andy Szal


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: collectivebargaining; govtunion; judgesumi; overreachingjudge; sumi; wisconsinshowdown
The Dane County Court judge whose son is a union employee has enjoined further implementation of the collective bargaining bill.

The Department of Justice issued the following statement in response to Judge Sumi's order:

"As we told the Court, we have serious concerns about the court’s decision to continue these proceedings under the current set of circumstances. We’ll take the time between now and the next scheduled hearing to decide what our best options are to protect the State’s interests, as is the Department of Justice’s statutory duty."

--- The notion that a county court judge can direct the actions of the sovereign state Senate is freaking ridiculous.

1 posted on 03/29/2011 5:08:18 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Black robed tyranny brought to us by a judge who was bought and paid for by union thug money.


2 posted on 03/29/2011 5:11:14 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

This “judge” needs to be impeached.


3 posted on 03/29/2011 5:13:02 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Taxpayer’s new name for Summi, is “Dummi Summi” and she don’t kiss you first.


4 posted on 03/29/2011 5:13:47 PM PDT by blackdog (The mystery of government is not how Washington works but how to make it stop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Gee, a judge’s orders don’t stop Obama and his thugs from doing what they please.

Get the Senate back in session and pass a law that says the court has no standing regarding this law.

Otherwise, fire the Senate and Assembly and let this asswipe judge make all the laws.


5 posted on 03/29/2011 5:17:19 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“The judge reiterated that lawmakers could easily implement the law through another, properly noticed committee hearing and legislative vote, commenting that “when taxpayers are paying the bill, that needs to be part of the discussion” of continuing litigation. “

I thought the revenue portion was stripped out so they could vote on it.


6 posted on 03/29/2011 5:20:55 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (The most dangerous place on the face of the earth is between a liberal and their money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I’ve never understood how one judge on the lowest rung on the state judicial totem poll can bind both the legislative and executive branch of the state with a retraining order. I was always under the impression that a judge only had authority in his or her judicial circuit. I would love to see the Governor say, thanks for your opinion but I’m going to ignore your retraining order and implement the law anyway. Would a peon circuit judge actually have any authority to stop him?


7 posted on 03/29/2011 5:21:05 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

How many divisions has she got?


8 posted on 03/29/2011 5:22:09 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“The Department of Justice issued the following statement in response to Judge Sumi’s order:

“As we told the Court, we have serious concerns about the court’s decision to continue these proceedings under the current set of circumstances. We’ll take the time between now and the next scheduled hearing to decide what our best options are to protect the State’s interests, as is the Department of Justice’s statutory duty.”

Screw the “more strongly worded letter” bullshit and ignore the damned judge. Play some hardball for once.


9 posted on 03/29/2011 5:23:42 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (The most dangerous place on the face of the earth is between a liberal and their money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

T***T! She will have no financial worries for the rest of her life, Bought and Paid for. I wonder how it must feel to use your position to bypass the will of the people..but then there is the money and thats all thats counts.


10 posted on 03/29/2011 5:27:29 PM PDT by mongo141
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
However, in other news, Obamacare continues on its merry way, being implemented, staffed-up, and proceeding to its Agenda goal of socialized medicine, in spite of being found Un-Constitutional.....but it is buried and not talked about by the State-Run-Media whatsoever.
11 posted on 03/29/2011 5:31:00 PM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Yes. The governor should go ahead and implement the full bill while petitioning the court for "a clarification' of her previous ruling which was unclear as to meaning. I think that's the way they do it in Washington, isn't it.
12 posted on 03/29/2011 5:31:28 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

How about they bring the bill to the floor tomorrow and vote on it. This time the first bill, not the 2nd. Then the court has no standing. Although I thought the court had no standing anyway!


13 posted on 03/29/2011 5:39:58 PM PDT by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Walker still has the option of doing lay offs, correct ?


14 posted on 03/29/2011 5:44:35 PM PDT by IH8DEMS (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Walker still has the option of doing lay offs, correct ?


15 posted on 03/29/2011 5:44:45 PM PDT by IH8DEMS (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IH8DEMS

Vote again, include Cops and Firefighters.........swallow that!


16 posted on 03/29/2011 5:58:19 PM PDT by outhousepatrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
“The judge reiterated that lawmakers could easily implement the law through another, properly noticed committee hearing and legislative vote, commenting that “when taxpayers are paying the bill, that needs to be part of the discussion” of continuing litigation. “

Whether or not the bill has to go to committee or not or how the State Senate decides upon the rules of how legislation proceeds to a vote has never ever been subject to judicial review.

The Constitution of the United States specifically states that each house must decide upon its rules.

The Constitution of Wisconsin has the exact same language.

This judge needs to be disbarred immediately.

17 posted on 03/29/2011 6:09:20 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALPAPilot

If not disbarred, then at least disrobed.


18 posted on 03/29/2011 7:59:42 PM PDT by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson